Showing posts with label Antibiotic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Antibiotic. Show all posts

ECDC: Multidrug Resistant Infections Increasing In Europe

image

Consumption of antibiotics for systemic use in the community in EU/EEA countries, 2010 - Source

# 6721

 

November 18th is set aside each year by the ECDC and their partners as European Antibiotic Awareness Day. For the past 5 years they have mounted coordinated events to get the message out on the safe and sane use of antibiotics in the face of increasingly resistant bacteria.

 

You’ll find an excellent infographic, along with a number of other resources, available on the ECDC’s Antibiotics Awareness Day web page.

image

 

Coinciding with the 2012 observance, we have the release of new data on the consumption of antibiotics in the EU, along with numbers showing the rise in multi-drug resistant organisms.

 

A few excerpts from the ECDC news release, followed by links to the reports.  Follow the link for more.

 

 

Multidrug antibiotic resistance increasing in Europe

16 Nov 2012

On the occasion of the 5th edition of the European Antibiotic Awareness Day, ECDC releases new EU-wide data on antibiotic resistance and consumption. Antibiotic resistance still remains a major European and global public health problem and is, for a large part, driven by misuse of antibiotics. ECDC data show that over the last four years there has been a significant increasing trend of combined resistance to multiple antibiotics in both Klebsiella pneumoniae and E. coli in more than one-third of the EU/EEA countries. In several Member States, between 25 percent and up to more than 60 percent of Klebsiella pneumoniae from bloodstream infections show combined resistance to multiple antibiotics. Options for treatment of patients who are infected with such multidrug-resistant bacteria are limited to only few last-line antibiotics.

 

Antibiotic resistance is still a very serious threat to the health of European citizens, because it leads to increasing healthcare costs, extra length of stay in the hospital, treatment failures, and sometimes death. Speaking at a press event organised by ECDC and the European Commission in Brussels, ECDC Director Marc Sprenger said: “ECDC data show that over the last several years, there has been a Europe-wide increase of antibiotic resistance and of multidrug resistance in Gram-negative bacteria such as Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli (E. coli). This means that, for patients who are infected with these bacteria, few last-line antibiotics, like carbapenems, remain available”.

 

Furthermore, ECDC data show that consumption of carbapenems – a major last-line class of antibiotics – increased significantly in EU/EEA countries from 2007 to 2010. This is the likely consequence of increasing multidrug resistance in Gram-negative infections, such as bloodstream infections or pneumonia, since carbapenems are often used to treat such infections. However, the percentage of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae is already high and increasing in some countries in the EU.

 

He added: “There are, in contrast, some good news: in the past few years, meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), has shown either a decrease or a stabilisation in most EU countries. Nevertheless, we must remain vigilant, as the percentage of Staphylococcus aureus resistant to meticilin remains above 25% in more than one fourth of the reporting countries, mainly in Southern and Eastern Europe”.

(Continue . . .)

 

News release
European Antibiotic Awareness Day 2012 – Latest data
European Antibiotic Awareness Day 2012 website
Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Europe 2011

 

image 

ECDC Infographic – Click to enlarge

 

For a look at the CDC’s Get Smart About Antibiotics Week here in the United States, you wish to revisit:

 

A Health Crisis In Slow Motion
»» Read More

CHP: Review Of NDM-1 In Hong Kong

image

Inoculated MacConkey agar culture plate cultivated colonial growth of Gram-negative, small rod-shaped and facultatively anaerobic Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteria. – CDC PHIL.

 

# 6719

 

The Centre for Health Protection publishes a weekly Communicable Disease Watch, where they highlight recent infectious disease events in and around Hong Kong.

 

Today, they include a review of the resistance enzyme NDM-1 (New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase-1) which was first detected in a patient in Sweden (albeit with Indian origins) four years ago, but has subsequently spread to many countries around the world.

 

This enzyme confers resistance to certain gram negative bacteria like E.coli and Klebsiella against a class of antibiotics called carbapenems. Carbapenems are often our drug of last resort against a variety of bacterial infections.

 

Of particular concern, this enzyme is carried by a plasmid – a snippet of portable DNA  - that can be transferred to other types of bacteria (see Study: Adaptation Of Plasmids To New Bacterial Species).

 

The rise of antibiotic resistance - including this emerging NDM-1 enzyme - has long been linked to the overuse and misuse of antibiotics. A practice that is still widespread in many parts of the world, but is particularly rampant on the Indian sub-continent.

 

Citing a lack of doctors and low family incomes, the Indian government (see India: Still Looking For A Policy On Antibiotics) has been slow to stop the sale of antibiotics to the public without a doctor’s prescription.

 

It’s been more than 2 years since The Lancet published a study (see NDM-1: A New Acronym To Memorize)  by Walsh, Toleman, Livermore, et al. that sounded the alarm on the emergence and growing prevalence of the NDM-1 enzyme on the Indian sub-continent.

 

Since that time, we’ve seen a slow, but inexorable spread of NDM-1 carrying bacteria around the globe. A few of my past blogs on the subject include:

 

Carbapenemases Rising

NDM-1: One Year Later

WHO Unveils 6-Point Plan To Preserve Antibiotic Effectiveness

Eurosurveillance On Antimicrobial Resistance

 

 

Today’s report from the HPC indicates that they have identified 17 patients carrying the NDM-1 enzyme over the past four years, with one case each in 2009 and 2010, three cases in 2011, and 12 cases so far in 2012.

 

Many of these cases were colonized and detected through routine screening, but were asymptomatic. As this report indicates:

 

Infections varied from colonisation or mild to potentially life threatening or fatal. The level of risk depends upon which body part is infected and general health of the patient.

 

I’ve included some excerpts, but follow the link to read:

 

image
 

image
Source CHP Communicable Disease Watch

Among the 17 cases, 13 (76%) were male, and the median age was 64 years (ranged from 11 months to 94 years). Fourteen (82%) were Chinese, 2 Indian and 1 Burmese.

 

Among 16 imported cases, all except one had history of admission to hospitals while staying abroad. Twelve were hospitalised in Mainland China (8 in Guangdong province, 2 in Hunan province, 1 in Fujian province and 1 in Henan province), one in India, one in Myanmar and one in Thailand. Six (40%) of them had operations done during their hospitalisation.

 

The one without history of admission to hospital was a 66-year-old male patient of Indian ethnicity and he had travelled to India before onset of symptoms. Four cases had signs of infection (2 had chest infection, 1 urinary tract infection and 1 leg infection). 

 

Thirteen were asymptomatic colonisation detected by screening or contact tracing. One had the bacteria yielded from both sputum and rectal swab specimens. Two cases passed away due to underlying illness and aspiration pneumonia respectively.

 

In September 2012, CHP identified an import-related NDM-1 case affecting a 64-year-old man. A rectal swab was taken for this patient as part of the contact tracing exercise for another imported NDM-1 patient (78-year-old man) from Myanmar. They had stayed in the same cubicle of a hospital ward in Hong Kong.

 

The rectal swab was tested positive for NDM-1. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns of the two NDM-1 strains were subsequently found to be identical by the Public Health Laboratory Services Branch (PHLSB) of CHP.


This suggests that the 64-year-old case was epidemiologically linked to the 78-year-old imported case. Thirteen other patients stayed in the same cubicles as the case patients for more than 48 hours were screened by rectal swabs and all were tested negative.

 

 

This week is antibiotic awareness week (see A Health Crisis In Slow Motion) here in the United States, as it is in many places around the world. The erosion of the effectiveness of our antimicrobial arsenal increases with each year, and leads many doctors and scientists to worry that we’ll eventually lose the ability to treat even common infections.

 

For a far more complete discussion of antimicrobial resistance issues, I can think of no better primer than Maryn McKenna’s book SUPERBUG: The Fatal Menace of MRSA. And Maryn’s SUPERBUG Blog, part of Wired Science Blogs, continues to provide the best day-to-day coverage of these issues.

»» Read More

Referral: McKenna On Resistant Gonorrhea

 

image

Credit CDC

 


# 6487

 

A topic that Maryn McKenna and I have both blogged about at length over the past year – Increasingly Drug Resistant Gonorrhea - was the subject of a major announcement out of the CDC yesterday.

 

In the wake of rising treatment failures with the existing treatment protocol, Thursday’s MMWR contained new guidelines on the treatment of gonorrhea, making the oral antibiotic cefixamine no longer the first line drug of choice, and substituting injectable ceftriaxone along with oral doses of either azithromycin or doxycycline.

 

 

Last night, Maryn McKenna – Flublogia’s expert in all things antibiotic resistant  - wrote about this bulletin in her SUPERBUG BLOG, and so I would invite you to jump  over to her site to read:

 

Resistant Gonorrhea: CDC Says Just One Drug Left

 

This problem extends far beyond the growing incidence of resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae. You’ll find Maryn’s 2010 book Superbug: The Fatal Menace of MRSA serves as a terrific wakeup call and primer covering a wide range of these resistance issues. 

 

We’ve known this day was coming, of course. Over the past year I’ve written about the warning signs in:

 

ECDC Response Plan To Multi-Drug Resistant Gonorrhea

WHO: Urgent Action Needed On Resistant Gonorrhea

CDC Grand Rounds: Multidrug-Resistant Gonorrhea

Going, Going, Gonorrhea

The Path Of Increased Resistance

 

 

History has taught us – that given enough time – bacterial pathogens often manage to evolve resistance to whatever antibiotics we use against them.

 

With few new classes of antimicrobials in the developmental pipeline, the fear is that a few years down the road, our ability to treat even the simplest of infections may be compromised.

 

Director-General Margaret Chan of the WHO warned earlier this year during a keynote address to the Conference on Combating Antimicrobial Resistance in  Copenhagen, Denmark that our World Faces A `Post-Antibiotic Era’.

 

The D-G’s entire remarks may be viewed on the WHO’s website at Antimicrobial resistance in the European Union and the world, but I’ve excerpted a few choice statements below, after which you’ll find a link to the World Health Organization’s latest publication on antibiotic resistance.

 

Excerpts from D-G Chan’s March 14th, 2012 speech.

 

If current trends continue unabated, the future is easy to predict. Some experts say we are moving back to the pre-antibiotic era. No. This will be a post-antibiotic era. In terms of new replacement antibiotics, the pipeline is virtually dry, especially for gram-negative bacteria. The cupboard is nearly bare.

<SNIP>

 

A post-antibiotic era means, in effect, an end to modern medicine as we know it. Things as common as strep throat or a child’s scratched knee could once again kill.

 

The World Health Organization recently released a 120 page book that provides options and strategies for combating this global threat.

 

The evolving threat of antimicrobial resistance - Options for action

Authors:
World Health Organization

Publication details

Number of pages: 120
Publication date: 2012
Languages: English
ISBN: 978 92 4 1503181

»» Read More

Study: Antimicrobial Prescribing Practices During The 2009 Pandemic

image

Photo Credit – CDC

 

# 6479

 

One of the most common dilemmas that doctors face is whether or not to prescribe an antibiotic for a patient presenting with an FRI (Febrile Respiratory Illness) often defined as a fever > 38C accompanied by a cough, sore throat, or runny nose.

 

While these illnesses are often caused by a simple viral infection, there is always the possibility that the patient may have (or may subsequently develop) a bacterial infection.

 

Since there is little in a patients physical appearance that can help distinguish between a viral and a bacterial respiratory infection, many doctors will decide to err on the side of caution and prescribe an antibiotic, “just in case”.

 

The problem is that the over-prescribing of antibiotics is viewed as one of the main forces driving the continual growth of antibiotic resistance.  

 

Guidelines (created by the CDC in cooperation with other medical organizations) have been developed to assist the doctor in the prescribing of antibiotics for upper respiratory infections (Adult Treatment Guidelines, Pediatric Treatment Guidelines).

 

The CDC has also prepared patient education information on when antibiotics are appropriate (see the CDC’s GET SMART ABOUT ANTIBIOTICS website).

 image

 

But in the end, it often comes down to the primary care provider’s gut feeling whether or not to prescribe an antibiotic. According to a study that appeared yesterday in the Annals of Internal Medicine, Epidemiological Context – not just patient appearance - can be one of the factors that influences this decision.

 

The study is called:

 

The Influence of Context on Antimicrobial Prescribing for Febrile Respiratory Illness: A Cohort Study

Courtney Hebert, MD; Jennifer Beaumont, MS; Gene Schwartz, MD; and Ari Robicsek, MD

 


The authors undertook a 5.5 year retrospective cohort study on the prescribing of antibiotics to patients seen by a network of Midwest primary care providers during influenza seasons between 2006 and 2011.

 

Their results, compiled from 28,301 patient encounters with signs of an FRI – seen by 69 physicians across 26 practices - is illuminating.

 

  • They found that during the pandemic flu season (April to June 2009 - Sept 2009 to March 2010) antibiotic prescribing dropped significantly over that seen during non-pandemic flu seasons (39.2% versus 47.5%)
  • Furthermore, they found the odds that a doctor would prescribe an antibiotic decreased as the number of FRI cases that they had seen in the previous week increased.

 

In other words, the more viral illness that a doctor perceives to be circulating in their community, the less likely that doctor is to prescribe an antibiotic.

 

Perhaps more surprising was the range of antibiotic script writing by doctors across this limited geographic region.

 

Overall, antibiotics were prescribed in just under half (45.2%) of all FRI cases, but among individual clinicians that number ranged from a low of 17.9% to a high of 83.7%.

 

While there may be other factors not readily apparent from these numbers, there does appear to be a surprising diversity of opinion among clinicians over the appropriateness of prescribing of antibiotics for FRIs.

 

Although limited in both size and scope, this study suggests that finding ways to keep doctors better informed on what illnesses are currently circulating in their community might help moderate the unnecessary prescribing of antibiotics.

 

You’ll also find an accompanying editorial in the same issue of Annals Of Internal Medicine, that stresses it is important to not only determine which external factors affect clinician’s decisions, “but how and why”.

 

The Context of Antibiotic Overuse

Sara Ackerman, PhD, MPH; and Ralph Gonzales, MD, MSPH

 

 

For more on the importance of proper antibiotic usage, you may wish to revisit these earlier blogs.

 

Chan: World Faces A `Post-Antibiotic Era’

Get Smart About Antibiotics Week

IDSA: Educational Guidelines Lower Antibiotic Use

 

 

And for a far more complete (and eye-opening) discussion of antimicrobial resistance issues, I can think of no better primer than Maryn McKenna’s book SUPERBUG: The Fatal Menace of MRSA.

 

And Maryn’s SUPERBUG Blog, part of Wired Science Blogs, continues to provide the best day-to-day coverage of these issues.

»» Read More

ECDC Response Plan To Multi-Drug Resistant Gonorrhea

 

 

# 6379

 

 

Last week in WHO: Urgent Action Needed On Resistant Gonorrhea, I updated a story that Maryn McKenna and I have both written about on several occasions over the past couple of years; the worrisome rise in antibiotic-resistant gonorrhea around the globe.

 

Early last month Maryn wrote Drug-Resistant Gonorrhea: How We Lost Track and last year she penned The Clap Came Back: Multidrug-Resistant Gonorrhea, both of which are highly recommended reading.

 

You’ll find a couple of my earlier offerings here, and here.

 

Today the ECDC has released a series of reports, including a 23-page technical document with their response plan to control and manage the threat of multidrug-resistant gonorrhea in Europe.

 

image

 

 

Released today as well is a 41-page document called Gonococcal antimicrobial susceptibility surveillance in Europe – 2010, that finds a worrisome trend:

 

image

Euro-GASP 2010 identified a significant increase in the proportion of tested isolates that show decreased susceptibility to cefixime, from 4% in 2009 to 9% in 2010, using a cut-off of >0.125 mg/L. Rates of ciprofloxacin and azithromycin resistance remain high (53% and 7%, respectively).

 


Along with the two report, the ECDC has released their surveillance report Sexually transmitted infections in Europe 1990-2010, tracking the spread and prevalence of five STI’s (syphilis, congenital syphilis, gonorrhoea, chlamydia and lymphogranuloma  venereum (LGV)) across the EU over the past 2 decades.

 

Details and links follow:

 

 

 

Concerns about future treatment of gonorrhoea in Europe: ECDC issues response plan

11 Jun 2012

ECDC

With more than 32 000 cases, gonorrhoea was the second most commonly reported sexually transmitted infection (STI) in Europe in 2010. As data from the ECDC report Gonococcal antimicrobial susceptibility surveillance in Europe 2010 illustrates, gonococci have become more resistant to common agents for treatment and show reduced susceptibility to newer antibiotics. “This indicates the risk that gonorrhoea may become an untreatable disease in the near future”, stresses ECDC Director Marc Sprenger.


In response to these signals, ECDC today also publishes its Response plan to control and manage the threat of multidrug-resistant gonorrhoea in Europe.

 

Results from the European Gonococcal Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme (Euro-GASP)  show that the percentage of isolates with decreased susceptibility to the recommended drug for treatment of gonorrhoea (cefixime) rose from 4% in 2009 to 9% in 2010. Decreased susceptibility was detected in 17 countries in 2010, seven more than in the previous year.

 

“Decreasing susceptibility to recommended antimicrobials and increasing numbers of treatment failures across Europe ask for careful monitoring of the European gonococcal population as the as the loss of the current recommended treatments could result in untreatable gonorrhoea”, says ECDC Director Marc Sprenger.

Read more

 

 

The problem of antibiotic resistance isn’t restricted to Neisseria gonorrhoeae, of course. The list of resistant bacteria is long and continues to expand, including such high profile pathogens as MRSA, NDM-1, KPC, EHEC.

 

While the end of the antibiotic era is not yet at hand, the fear is - without new drugs and the proper stewardship of the ones we already have - we may be drawing closer to that day.

 

A few of my blogs on the subject include:

 

UK: `New MRSA’ Strain Spreading
CMAJ: Local Acquisition Of NDM-1 In Ontario
India Looks For (And Finds) NDM-1
Carbapenemases Rising
WHO: The Threat Of Antimicrobial Resistance
NDM-1: A New Acronym To Memorize

 

And for a far more complete (and eye-opening) discussion of antimicrobial resistance issues, I can think of no better primer than Maryn McKenna’s book SUPERBUG: The Fatal Menace of MRSA.

»» Read More

WHO: Urgent Action Needed On Resistant Gonorrhea

 

 

# 6368

 

 

A subject that Maryn McKenna and I have both covered several times over the past year has been the worrisome rise in antibiotic-resistant gonorrhea around the globe. 

 

Early last month Maryn wrote Drug-Resistant Gonorrhea: How We Lost Track and last year she penned The Clap Came Back: Multidrug-Resistant Gonorrhea, both of which are highly recommended reading.

 

Last year in The Path Of Increased Resistance I wrote about the history and recent rise of resistant gonorrhea around the globe and an MMWR report (Cephalosporin Susceptibility Among Neisseria gonorrhoeae Isolates --- United States, 2000—2010) chronicling its spread over the past decade.

 

Briefly, I wrote:

 

Despite 70 years of effective antibiotic treatment for this sexually transmitted disease, it remains the second most common STD in the United States.  The CDC  estimates that more than 700,000 persons in the U.S. contract gonorrhea each year, although less than half of those infections are reported to CDC.

 

In 2009, the CDC recorded 301,174 cases of gonorrhea.

 

The introduction of penicillin in the 1940s represented the first truly effective treatment for this scourge.  And for roughly 30 years, penicillin and tetracycline both proved effective weapons against this disease.

 

But by the 1970s penicillin/tetracycline resistant forms of Neisseria gonorrhoeae began to appear in the United States, and by the 1980s had become common. In response, the CDC began recommending cephalosporins as the first-line treatment for gonorrhea.

 

In 1993, the CDC also recommended the use of fluoroquinolones (i.e., ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, or levofloxacin) to treat gonorrhea, as they were relatively cheap, effective, and allowed for a 1 dose treatment.

 

But in less than a decade, fluoroquinolone-resistant N. gonorrhoeae (QRNG) emerged out of Asia and began showing up in Hawaii and then California (see MMWR Increases in Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae --- Hawaii and California, 2001)

 

In 2007, the CDC announced Fluoroquinolones No Longer Recommended for Treatment of Gonococcal Infections, leaving just one class of antibiotics - the cephalosporins -still recommended and available for the treatment of gonorrhea.

 

Last month the CDC Grand Rounds: Multidrug-Resistant Gonorrhea webcast provided expert presentations from:

Edward Hook III, MD
William Shafer, PhD
Carolyn Deal, PhD 
Robert D. Kirkcaldy, MD, MPH

 

All of which serves as prelude to a news release today from the World Health Organization on the growing global threat of resistant gonorrhea.

 

WHO: Urgent action needed to prevent the spread of untreatable gonorrhoea

Note for the media

6 June 2012 | Geneva - Millions of people with gonorrhoea may be at risk of running out of treatment options unless urgent action is taken, according WHO. Already several countries, including Australia, France, Japan, Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom are reporting cases of resistance to cephalosporin antibiotics – the last treatment option against gonorrhoea. Every year an estimated 106 million people are infected with gonorrhea, which is transmitted sexually.

Dwindling treatment options

“Gonorrhoea is becoming a major public health challenge, due to the high incidence of infections accompanied by dwindling treatment options,” says Dr Manjula Lusti-Narasimhan, from the Department of Reproductive Health and Research at WHO. “The available data only shows the tip of the iceberg. Without adequate surveillance we won’t know the extent of resistance to gonorrhoea and without research into new antimicrobial agents, there could soon be no effective treatment for patients.”

Correct use of antibiotics needed

In new guidance issued today, WHO is calling for greater vigilance on the correct use of antibiotics and more research into alternative treatment regimens for gonococcal infections. WHO’s Global Action Plan to control the spread and impact of antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoea also calls for increased monitoring and reporting of resistant strains as well as better prevention, diagnosis and control of gonococcal infections.

Health implications are important

Gonorrhoea makes up one quarter of the four major curable sexually-transmitted infections1. Since the development of antibiotics, the pathogen has developed resistance to many of the common antibiotics used as treatment, including penicillin, tetracyclines and quinolones.

 

“We are very concerned about recent reports of treatment failure from the last effective treatment option – the class of cephalosporin antibiotics – as there are no new therapeutic drugs in development,” says Dr Lusti-Narasimhan. “If gonococcal infections become untreatable, the health implications are significant.”

Antimicrobial resistance

Antimicrobial resistance is caused by the unrestricted access to antimicrobials, overuse and poor quality of antibiotics, as well as natural genetic mutations within disease organisms. In addition, gonorrhoea strains tend to retain genetic resistance to previous antibiotics even after their use has been discontinued. The extent of this resistance worldwide is not known due to lack of reliable data for gonorrhoea in many countries and insufficient research.

Gonorrhoea

Untreated gonococcal infection can cause health problems in men, women and newborn babies including:

  • infection of the urethra, cervix and rectum;
  • infertility in both men and women;
  • a significantly increased risk of HIV infection and transmission;
  • ectopic pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, stillbirths and premature deliveries; and
  • severe eye infections occur in 30-50% of babies born to women with untreated gonorrhoea, which can lead to blindness.

Gonorrhoea can be prevented through safer sexual intercourse. Early detection and prompt treatment, including of sexual partners, is essential to control sexually transmitted infections.

1 The four major curable sexually-transmitted infections are syphilis, gonorrhoea, chlamydial infection and trichomoniasis.

 

Global action plan to control the spread and impact of antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae

Share

 

Authors:
World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research

Publication details

Number of pages: 36
Publication date: 2012
Languages: English
ISBN: 978 92 4 150350 1 - Web only

Downloads

 

In a related story, Director-General Margaret Chan of the WHO warned this year during a keynote address to the Conference on Combating Antimicrobial Resistance in  Copenhagen, Denmark that our World Faces A `Post-Antibiotic Era’.

 

The D-G’s entire remarks may be viewed on the WHO’s website at Antimicrobial resistance in the European Union and the world, but I’ve excerpted a few choice statements below, after which you’ll find a link to the World Health Organization’s latest publication on antibiotic resistance.

 

Excerpts from D-G Chan’s March 14th, 2012 speech.

 

Antimicrobial resistance is on the rise in Europe, and elsewhere in the world. We are losing our first-line antimicrobials. Replacement treatments are more costly, more toxic, need much longer durations of treatment, and may require treatment in intensive care units.

 

For patients infected with some drug-resistant pathogens, mortality has been shown to increase by around 50%. Let me give an example of what this means for a disease of global significance.

<SNIP>

If current trends continue unabated, the future is easy to predict. Some experts say we are moving back to the pre-antibiotic era. No. This will be a post-antibiotic era. In terms of new replacement antibiotics, the pipeline is virtually dry, especially for gram-negative bacteria. The cupboard is nearly bare.

 

<SNIP>

 

A post-antibiotic era means, in effect, an end to modern medicine as we know it. Things as common as strep throat or a child’s scratched knee could once again kill.

 

The World Health Organization recently released a 120 page book that provides options and strategies for combating this global threat.

 

The evolving threat of antimicrobial resistance - Options for action

 

Authors:
World Health Organization

Publication details

Number of pages: 120
Publication date: 2012
Languages: English
ISBN: 978 92 4 1503181

»» Read More

Referral: McKenna Times Four

 

 

# 6367

 

 

Maryn McKenna has two new blogs up, both dealing with the dangers of antibiotics in livestock, and a new article in SELF Magazine, and all three are very much worth taking the time to read this morning.

 

As an added bonus, Maryn will also be conducting a twitter chat tomorrow (details below), so block out an hour of your time and start thinking about your questions.

 

While I scrounge around looking for something for my own blog this morning, I would invite you to jump over to Maryn’s site to read:

 

Court Scolds FDA Over Ag Antibiotic Use

 

 

The Superbugs In Your Dinner (Bonus: Twitterchat!)

 

 

As her second blog explains, Maryn has a major new article up on SELF Magazine, and tomorrow Maryn will hold a twitter chat.  The details from Maryn’s blog follow:

 

Now: Bonus! With SELF’s help, Lisa and I are going to conduct a Twitterchat tomorrow (Thursday, June 7), starting at 4 pm ET and going for an hour. To participate, follow me (@marynmck), Lisa (@adamslisa) or SELF (@SELFMagazine), or watch for the hashtag #superbugs. Send us your questions in advance or during the chat. We really want to hear from you.

 

 

And finally, for anyone who has not yet read Maryn’s eye-opening 2010 book Superbug: The Fatal Menace of MRSA, a link to my review.

image

»» Read More

HPA: Healthcare-Associated Infection (HCAI) Survey

 


# 6340

 

The UK’s HPA has released a comprehensive survey of antimicrobial use, and HCAI (Healthcare-Associated Infections), across 114 hospitals (99 NHS acute trusts and 5 independent sector organizations), providing us with a snapshot of conditions between September and November 2011.

 

Although the full global burden of HCAIs or HAIs (Hospital Acquired Infections) is unknown and underappreciated, even in countries with modern healthcare facilities they constitute a major threat to life and health.

 

The following is an oft quoted assessment from the CDC on HAI’s (Hospital Acquired Infections) in the United States back in 2010.

A new report from CDC updates previous estimates of healthcare-associated infections. In American hospitals alone, healthcare-associated infections account for an estimated 1.7 million infections and 99,000 associated deaths each year. Of these infections:

  • 32 percent of all healthcare-associated infection are urinary tract infections
  • 22 percent are surgical site infections
  • 15 percent are pneumonia (lung infections)
  • 14 percent are bloodstream infections

 

The subject of HAIs is often addressed by Maryn McKenna on her excellent Superbug Blog, and was a major focus of her book SUPERBUG: The Fatal Menace Of MRSA. Both are highly recommended.

 

The HPA is working to reduce the incidence of HAIs in the UK, and according to their latest report, progress has been made. The greatest reductions have been made in MRSA bloodstream infections and C. difficile infections.

 

Of special note, Enterobacteriaceae (includes E. coli, Klebsiella spp.,Enterobacter spp. and others) were the most frequently reported organisms associated with HCAI, infecting roughly .9% of the patient population, and making up nearly 1/3rd of all infections.

 

Links to the 140 page preliminary report, 144 page appendices, and a 16  page FAQ at the link below.

 

English National Point Prevalence Survey on Healthcare-associated Infections and Antimicrobial Use, 2011: preliminary data

English PPS on HCAI and AMU 2011

Authors:

HPA

Publication date: May 2012

Synopsis

The Health Protection Agency (HPA) coordinated the fourth National Point Prevalence Survey (PPS) on healthcare-associated infection (HCAI) and first National PPS on antimicrobial use (AMU) in England. This survey is not directly comparable to previous surveys.

 

The aims of the PPS were to determine the burden of HCAI and AMU in acute hospitals and to use the results to identify priority areas for the future.

Key points

  • The prevalence of healthcare-associated infections (HCAI) was 6.4% in 2011 compared to 8.2% in 2006.
  • The most frequent HCAIs detected were respiratory tract, urinary tract and surgical site infections.
  • The prevalence of antimicrobial use (AMU) was 34.7%. This is the first time AMU was measured nationally. This provides a baseline for future monitoring.
  • The prevalence of HCAIs, AMU and device use was highest in intensive care units, which relates in part to the complexity and vulnerability of patients in this setting.

Download full publication

English National Point Prevalence Survey on Healthcare-Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Use, 2011 - Appendices (PDF, 3.3 MB)

 

PPS Frequently Asked Questions (PDF, 654 KB)

 

English National Point Prevalence Survey on Healthcare-associated Infections and Antimicrobial Use, 2011 (PDF, 1.9 MB)

 

While there is much to be gleaned from these reports, a few highlights from the FAQ include:

 

 

3.1 What is the overall prevalence of HCAI in English hospitals?

The overall prevalence of HCAI in acute hospitals was 6.4%.The prevalence in NHS acute trusts was 6.5% Independent sector organisation had a lower prevalence of HCAI of 2.2%.

It is not appropriate to compare the prevalence between these hospital types because they represent distinct case mixes, patient populations and specialties. Further the numbers included were very small in paediatric and independent hospitals and these results should be interpreted with caution.


3.2 Does a prevalence of 6.4% mean that if I go in to hospital I have a one in sixteen chance of getting a HCAI?

No. This means that at any time one in sixteen inpatients in hospital will have a HCAI. A prevalence survey counts the number of patients with HCAI at any point in time.

People with HCAI tend to stay in hospital longer and those patients who stay in hospital for longer periods of treatment tend to be more seriously ill and therefore more at risk of contracting HCAI. The large majority of patients are successfully treated in hospital and go home without acquiring a HCAI.


3.3 Can you tell me what my chance is of contracting HCAI during my hospital stay?


No. This is not shown by the current prevalence survey. In order to calculate how likely a person is to get a HCAI an incidence study would be required. This would look at all patients who were treated within the hospital on a regular basis over a defined time period.

 

 

 

 

The other focus of this survey was to determine the level of AMU (Antimicrobial Usage) in acute care hospitals in England.  The report found:

 

The overall prevalence of AMU was 34.7%. The prevalence of AMU was greatest in the independent sector hospitals (46.7%) compared with NHS organisations at 34.3%. The prevalence of AMU in adults was 35.3% and in paediatrics 28.7%. AMU prevalence was greatest in ICU at 60.8%.


The total number of antimicrobials prescribed in the survey was 25,942 for 18,219 (34.7%) patients, which equates to 1.4 AM per patient prescribed antimicrobials. AMU were most frequently prescribed for community acquired infections (53.0%). Thirteen percent of patients were on an antimicrobial (AM) for surgical prophylaxis; 30.3% of surgical prophylaxis was administered for greater than one day.

 

The majority of AMU was for respiratory tract infections (30.9%). The second most common reason for AMU was skin, soft tissue, bone and joint infections (19.0%).

 


The use of a standardized survey technique should go a long ways towards developing better year-to-year comparisons of HCAIs and AMU in UK facilities, and will facilitate comparisons with other EU countries that have adopted similar surveys.

»» Read More

FDA Statement On Azithromycin & Cardiovascular Risks

 

 

image

 

# 6334

 

 

Yesterday in NEJM: Cardiovascular Risks Of Taking Azithromycin I wrote about a study that found a `small absolute increase in cardiovascular deaths’ among patients taking the macrolide antibiotic Azithromycin when compared to a control group taking no antibiotics or with taking amoxicillin.

In response to that study, the FDA has released the following statement:

 

FDA Statement regarding azithromycin (Zithromax) and the risk of cardiovascular death

[05-17-2012] The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is aware of the study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, on May 17, 2012, that compared the risks of cardiovascular death in patients treated with azithromycin (Zithromax), amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin (Cipro), levofloxacin (Levaquin), and no antibacterial drug.  The study reported a small increase in cardiovascular deaths, and in the risk of death from any cause, in persons treated with a 5-day course of azithromycin (Zithromax) compared to persons treated with amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, or no drug. The risks of cardiovascular death associated with levofloxacin treatment were similar to those associated with azithromycin treatment.  FDA is reviewing the results from this study and will communicate any new information that results from the FDA review.

 

Patients taking azithromycin should not stop taking their medicine without talking to their healthcare professional.

 

Healthcare professionals should be aware of the potential for QT interval prolongation and heart arrhythmias when prescribing or administering antibacterial drugs. (See additional information below.)

 

Azithromycin belongs to a class of antibacterial drugs called macrolides, which have been associated with cardiovascular effects; specifically, prolongation of the QT interval. Prolongation of the QT interval can lead to torsades de pointes (TdP), an abnormal heart rhythm, which can be fatal.  Azithromycin was the only macrolide examined in the published study; the study did not address other macrolide antibacterial drugs, such as clarithromycin (Biaxin) and erythromycin, regarding the potential for cardiovascular death.

 

In 2011, FDA reviewed macrolide drug labeling information related to QT interval prolongation and TdP. The WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS section of the Zmax drug label (azithromycin extended release for oral suspension) was revised in March 2012 to include new information regarding risk for QT interval prolongation, which appears to be low. The drug labels for clarithromycin and erythromycin also contain information about QT interval prolongation in the WARNINGS section. FDA is in the process of updating risk information in the drug labels for additional macrolide antibacterial drugs.

 

FDA-approved indications for azithromycin include:

  • Acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic pulmonary disease
  • Acute bacterial sinusitis
  • Community-acquired pneumonia
  • Pharyngitis/tonsillitis
  • Uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections
  • Urethritis and cervicitis
  • Genital ulcer disease

FDA will communicate any new information on azithromycin and this study or the potential risk of QT interval prolongation after the agency has completed its review.

»» Read More

NEJM: Cardiovascular Risks Of Taking Azithromycin

 

image

 

# 6331

 

 

Although it isn’t always fully appreciated, one of the `truths’ about medicine is that all drugs carry with them some risk of side effects. There is simply no such thing as a 100% safe and totally benign drug.

 

Often, adverse effects are so rare as to not show up during a drug’s clinical trials, and only become apparent after the drug has been in wide use for years.

 

It is axiomatic that anytime you take a drug, you must weigh its likely benefits against any potential health risks it may introduce. 

 

Today the NEJM has an article about the potential cardiovascular risks of taking one of the world’s most popular antibiotics; azithromycin

 

`Zith’ is a macrolide antibiotic chemically similar to erythromycin that is effective against a wide variety of bacteria. It is commonly used for middle ear infections, bronchitis, pneumonia, sinusitis and several sexually transmitted infections.

 

While generally well tolerated (and effective), known side effects include gastrointestinal difficulties (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea)  among less than 5% of those taking the drug, and more rarely, abnormal liver tests, allergic reactions, and nervousness.

 

Although some antibiotics are known to cause potentially dangerous cardiac arrhythmias, up until now `Zith’  has not been counted among them. 

 

Today’s study in the NEJM finds a small absolute increase in cardiovascular deaths during a 5-day treatment course with azithromycin compared to taking no antibiotics or with taking amoxicillin, particularly among those with cardiac risk factors.

 

Azithromycin and the Risk of Cardiovascular Death

Wayne A. Ray, Ph.D., Katherine T. Murray, M.D., Kathi Hall, B.S., Patrick G. Arbogast, Ph.D., and C. Michael Stein, M.B., Ch.B.

N Engl J Med 2012; 366:1881-1890 May 17, 2012

 

Conclusions

During 5 days of azithromycin therapy, there was a small absolute increase in cardiovascular deaths, which was most pronounced among patients with a high baseline risk of cardiovascular disease.

Before anyone starts pitching their Z-packs down the loo, the actual number of cardiovascular incidents was relatively small. And this study was a retrospective analysis of Tennessee Medicaid records between 1992 and 2006 – not a randomized control trial (RCT) - and therefore subject to a number of limitations.

 

Since the full study is behind a pay wall, for more on all of this we turn to coverage from MedPage Today:

 

Azithromycin May Up Risk of Cardiac Death

By Nancy Walsh, Staff Writer, MedPage Today

Published: May 16, 2012

Reviewed by Dori F. Zaleznik, MD; Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston.

Action Points

  • Explain that a Medicaid database study found an increased risk for cardiovascular death, sudden death, and overall all-cause mortality associated with a 5-day course of azithromycin.
  • Note that the same findings were not true for amoxicillin or ciprofloxacin compared with controls taking no antibiotics, but there were excess deaths associated with levofloxacin.

Use of a common antibiotic, azithromycin, appears to significantly increase the risk of sudden cardiac death when compared with no antibiotic treatment, according to analysis of data from Medicaid patients.

(Continue . . . )

 

None of this makes azithromycin a `bad medicine’, but it does highlight the need to recognize and balance the risks of taking this (or any other) drug with its likely benefits. 

 

And for some patients with elevated cardiac risk factors, it may be prudent for their doctors to now consider other antibiotic treatments.

 

Although antibiotics can often be lifesaving, evidence continues to mount that their use is less benign that previously thought.

 

The CDC reports that 50% of antibiotic use in hospitals is ` unnecessary or inappropriate’, and better antibiotic stewardship is needed if we are to combat the growing threat of antibiotic resistance.

 

You’ll find the CDC maintains an excellent GET SMART ABOUT ANTIBIOTICS webpage, which provides information on the prudent use of antibiotics.

 

And for more on the potential dangers of antibiotic use (and misuse) you may wish to revisit:

 

The Other Reason Not To Abuse Antibiotics
Get Smart About Antibiotics Week
ECDC/EMEA: Joint Report On Resistant Bacteria
»» Read More

Video: Maryn McKenna On Antibiotic Resistance

 

 

 

# 6163

 

Short of seeing a 1918-level or worse pandemic, I’ve little doubt that the rise of antibiotic resistant bacteria will be the number one public health story of the next couple of decades.

 

While MRSA was the big concern 3 or 4 years ago, today we are seeing the rise and geographic spread of NDM-1, extremely drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB), along with an expanding array of Carbapenemases  – bacteria that are resistant to the Carbapenem class of antibiotics.

 

 

Journalist, author, and everybody’s favorite scary disease girl Maryn McKenna produced a terrific book on the subject of antibiotic resistance in 2010, called SUPERBUG: The Fatal Menace Of MRSA

 

You can read my review of it HERE. Maryn is also the author of Beating Back The Devil, the inside story of the CDC’s Epidemic Intelligence Service.  

 

All of which puts Maryn on the top of the list of people you’d want to include in any documentary on antibiotic resistance. As it happens, UJI Films is working on exactly that; a film scheduled to be release later this year called RESISTANCE.

 

We’ve a bit of a preview this morning, by way of a 4-minute excerpt from the film featuring Maryn. You’ll also find several other short film clips on the resistancethefilm Youtube Channel, as well.

 

 

»» Read More

ECDC Comment On Drug Resistant TB In India

 

 

 

# 6067

 

 

While more than a little discomfiting, in recent years we’ve grown accustomed to hearing about MDR-TB (multi-drug resistant tuberculosis), and XDR-TB (extensively drug resistant Tuberculosis). 

 

These varyingly resistant forms of Tuberculosis have come about primarily as the result of incomplete, irregular, or inappropriate treatment and management of infected patients. Patient compliance for long-term treatment has long been a major obstacle.

 

Until now – as difficult as treatment might have been - there has always been some combination of antibiotics that could be used to treat even the most resistant of TB cases.

 

All that appeared to change a few weeks ago when it was announced in an ahead-of-print letter to the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases that a four cases of TDR (totally drug resistant) tuberculosis had been identified in India. A follow up news report indicated that there are now at least 12 known cases in one hospital alone.

 

For more background on this announcement, I would invite you to read Maryn McKenna’s recent blog entry called India Reports Completely Drug-Resistant TB.

 

Today the ECDC has published their own comments on this development, along with links to other TB-related documents, on their website.


One of the points being made in the comments section (excerpted below) is that the term TDR-TB is as yet not well defined, and may be misleading.

 

Total drug resistant TB is a relative notion and depends on the local drugs available and tested on. This term/expression should either be avoided or should be defined worldwide. The World Health Organization (WHO) has internationally-endorsed treatment recommendations for the treatment of drug-susceptible, MDR-TB and XDR-TB.

 

Successful treatment of TB is possible but requires full support from the health care system by offering optimal diagnostic services, high-quality drugs for the full time of treatment and support to the patient in fulfilling the treatment. To make this happen, strong TB diagnostic services and processes that ensure the rational use of TB drugs (1,2,3) are essential in order to be able to test all suspected TB cases for drug-resistance and to identify resistance as soon as possible to enable appropriate therapy. Furthermore, ensuring treatment outcome monitoring of all cases is vital.

 

Follow the link below to read the entire comment.

 

 

New drug resistant form of tuberculosis reported in India

12 Jan 2012

In a recent scientific article (Udwadia, F et al. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011, Dec 21, Eprint) four cases of so-called total drug resistant tuberculosis (TB) were reported from India. According to the article, these patients have shown resistance to all the first line TB drugs and to seven second line anti-TB drugs.


With the existing forms of multi-drug and extensively drug resistant TB (M/XDR-TB) this so-called total drug resistant TB would indicate that none of the known TB combination regimens would be effective for such patients.

Read more:

Read the ECDC comment on this in our full

Public Health Development “New drug resistant form of tuberculosis reported in India”


 

ECDC Tuberculosis Programme


Tuberculosis, a global challenge: discover the ECDC Spotlight


Get the facts: read the ECDC special report “Progressing towards TB elimination


Download the report “Tuberculosis surveillance in Europe 2009”


Discover the Spotlight “Tackling tuberculosis in children: towards a TB-free generation

Keep in touch with ECDC on facebook


Read the ECDC/WHO co-authored article Tackling the spread of drug-resistant tuberculosis in Europe

 

 

 

This story is just beginning to unfold, and I’m sure we’ll hear a lot more about it – and whether or not this new form of tuberculosis is indeed, as the study authors dubbed it - `totally resistant’ – in the coming months.

»» Read More

Get Smart About Antibiotics Week

 


image

 

# 5966

 

 

Short of seeing a Category 5 pandemic, I can think of no health threat that has a greater potential to threaten the general public than does the global rise in antibiotic resistant bacteria.

 

As Maryn McKenna so eloquently explained in her book Superbug: The Fatal Menace Of MRSA, not only are many of our older antibiotics losing their effectiveness, the number of replacement antibiotics under development is distressingly limited.

 

While it may sound alarmist, there are many scientists who fear that one day we may find ourselves facing a post-antibiotic world, where many of the infections we can treat today will no longer respond to the antibiotics we have remaining.

 

In April of this year, Margaret Chan – Director General of the World Health Organizationin a speech for World Health Day 2011, issued this stark warning:

 

In the absence of urgent corrective and protective actions, the world is heading towards a post-antibiotic era, in which many common infections will no longer have a cure and, once again, kill unabated.

 

 

Since much of this resistance has come about from inappropriate use of antibiotics (in humans, and on the farm), the immediate focus is on ways to curb their improper use.

 

This week the CDC is promoting their GET SMART about antibiotics campaign, while countries across Europe are promoting European Antibiotic Awareness Day tomorrow, November 18th.

 

image

 

Today, a round up of some antibiotic resistance resources for you to explore.

 

 

First stop, a short video from the CDC on the appropriate use of antibiotics.

 

 

The CDC has also introduced a number of new fact sheets and other promotional material for 2011 on antibiotic resistance.

 

Fact Sheets New 2011

                                                                 

 

Across the pond, the ECDC has posted a short (8 minute) documentary on antibiotic resistance, and some short PSA announcements which can be viewed at this link.

image

 

You’ll find additional European initiatives and information on the European Antibiotics Awareness Day website.

 

In support of the CDC & ECDC awareness campaigns, Clinical Infectious Diseases  and The Journal of Infectious Diseases  have made a number of recent articles on antibiotic resistance freely available for the month of November.

 

Clinical Infectious Diseases articles:

Editorial commentary: Outpatient Antibiotic Use in the United States: Time to "Get Smarter"


Behavior Change Strategies to Influence Antimicrobial Prescribing in Acute Care: A Systematic Review


The Interface Between Antibiotic Resistance and Virulence in Staphylococcus aureusand Its Impact Upon Clinical Outcomes


Rapid Diagnostics and Appropriate Antibiotic Use

Strategies for Reduction in Duration of Antibiotic Use in Hospitalized Patients

The Journal of Infectious Diseases articles:

Editor's Choice: Antibiotic Choice May Not Explain Poorer Outcomes in Patients With Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and High Vancomycin Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations


Editorial commentary: At What Cost Echinocandin Resistance?


Acinetobacter baumannii Resistant to Colistin Alters Its Antibiotic Resistance Profile: A Case Report From Spain


The Combination of a Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor and Antibiotic Alleviates Staphylococcal Arthritis and Sepsis in Mice


Divergent Mechanisms for Passive Pneumococcal Resistance to &szlig-Lactam Antibiotics in the Presence of Haemophilus influenza

 

 

And for good measure, a sampling of some of my antibiotic resistance essays from the past year.

 

India: The NDM-1 Story Continues
CDDEP: Mapping Resistance
NDM-1: One Year Later
ECDC/EMEA: Joint Report On Resistant Bacteria
Carbapenemases Rising
»» Read More