Showing posts with label UK. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UK. Show all posts

UK: Warning On Counterfeit Condoms

 

image

Photo Credit CDC PHIL

 

 


# 6830

 

Although its not exactly a new problem (reports go back several years), the number of cheap, unreliable, counterfeit condoms reaching retailers shelves in the UK is rising, prompting the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulation Agency (MHRA) to issue fresh warnings.

 

For the consumer, the problem is these knock-offs are almost impossible to tell apart from the real thing. Counterfeiters probably spent more on the misleading packaging, than on the product itself.

 

And according to the MHRA, these condoms are far more likely to fail than their legitimate counterparts, which can lead to unwanted pregnancies, and the spread of disease.

 

This from  BBC News.

 

New warnings over a rise in counterfeit condoms

Page last updated at 06:05 GMT, Monday, 7 January 2013By Greg Dawson

The government's health regulator has warned there are a rising number of counterfeit condoms being smuggled into to the UK.

 

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulation Agency (MHRA) claims millions have been illegally imported in the last 18 months.

 

Family planning experts say the bogus condoms don't provide protection against STIs or pregnancy.

(Continue . . . )

 

 

Lest anyone think this problem is limited to the UK, in 2011 a U.S. immigrant from China was sentenced to more than three years in prison by a Brooklyn, NY judge for importing more than a million `fake’ Trojan condoms.

 

Counterfeit Condom Trafficker Gets 37-Month Sentence

By Thom Weidlich - Aug 11, 2010 5:11 PM ET

(EXCERPT)

Jian “Jimmy” Wang was sentenced today by U.S. District JudgeBrian Cogan in Brooklyn, New York. Condoms tested from the same batch as Wang’s were found to burst, leak and lack spermicide, prosecutors said. The brands seized were Trojan Magnum, Trojan-ENZ, Trojan Ultra Ribbed and Trojan Mint Tingle, according to court papers.

 

There are undoubtedly millions of these cheap, unreliable, and potentially dangerous condoms in circulation around the globe, often sold in small shops or from vending machines.

 

Given how closely these counterfeit products resemble the brand name, officials warn the best way to avoid getting stung is to buy condoms from reputable dealers and pharmacies. 

 

A sensible enough protection that - like the condom itself - isn’t 100% reliable, but can substantially reduce the risk of pregnancy or disease.

»» Read More

HPA: Flu Activity In The UK

 

 

# 6820

 


While the United States and Canada have reported an early start to the flu season this year, influenza has yet to take off in Hong Kong (see latest Flu Express (Week 52, 2012), and in the UK and parts of Europe the flu season is just now starting to pick up. 

 

 

image

The RED LINE indicates this year’s activity, compared to previous years.  The Blue Line indicates the unusually severe 1999-2000 flu season.

 

 

This latest flu updates from the HPA.

 

HPA National Influenza Report

Report published 3 January 2013

Figures (including all those found in this report) displaying data from these schemes are available to download as a pdf file:

HPA Weekly National Influenza Graphs (PDF, 713 KB)

PDF versions of previous reports are available on the archive page.

This week's report is available as a pdf:

HPA National Influenza Report - week 1 (2013) (PDF, 665 KB)

A summary report will be published weekly. For further information on the surveillance schemes mentioned in this report, please see the Sources of UK Flu Data page.

Increases continue to be seen for several indicators of influenza activity. A letter has been issued to the NHS that GPs may now prescribe antiviral medicines for the prophylaxis and treatment of influenza in accordance with NICE guidance.

 

Flu activity update: 3 January 2013

3 January 2013

Latest figures from the Health Protection Agency (HPA) up to 30 December 2012 show that flu activity continues to increase based on a number of indicators, including GP consultation rates in England and the proportion of calls to NHS Direct.

 

The latest figures show that GP consultation rates have increased slightly from 27.4 per 100,000 in week 51 to 32.7 per 100,000 in week 52 ending on 30 December. Meanwhile, 2.1% of the calls received by NHS Direct concerned influenza compared to 1.6% in week 51.

 

Professor John Watson, head of the respiratory disease department at the HPA said:

 

“Over the Christmas period we have seen a slight rise in flu activity across several of our indicators in line with the trend we expect to see at this time of year.

 

“However, the latest data should be interpreted with caution due to GP practices being closed on the bank holidays which may have impacted on GP consultation rates.

(Continue . . . )

 

 

Elsewhere in Europe, the most recent EuroFlu report states:

 

Influenza activity is increasing slowly in the WHO European Region

Summary, week 51/2012

Influenza activity is slowly increasing with more countries in different parts of the Region reporting sporadic co-circulation of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2) and type B viruses. This week the reporting of influenza surveillance data is incomplete due to the Christmas holidays. This is reflected in the lower number of testing performed. However the percentage of influenza-positive samples from both sentinel and non-sentinel sources are similar to last week. The number of reported hospitalizations due to severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) remains similar to that seen in the previous several weeks: 1 influenza detection was reported (influenza B).

»» Read More

HPA Norovirus Update

norovirus 3D structure

Norovirus – Credit HPA

 


# 6817

 

The UK’s HPA has released a new update on their busy norovirus season, which has prompted headlines in British papers announcing more than One Million Cases this year.

 

That number is an extrapolation, based on the assumption that there are 288 uncounted cases for every case officially diagnosed.

 

So take it as an estimate, not a precise count.  Still, reported cases of norovirus are well ahead of last year’s numbers across the UK.

 

 

HPA update on seasonal norovirus activity: 2 January 2013

2 January 2013

Latest figures from the Health Protection Agency (HPA) show there have been 3,877 laboratory confirmed cases of norovirus this season (from week 27 to week 51 2012). The latest figures are 72 per cent higher than the number of cases reported at this point last year, when there were 2,255 cases.

 

During the Christmas period there is typically a drop in the number of laboratory reports. In previous norovirus seasons the general trend is that cases increase in the New Year and we expect to see cases rise again over the next few weeks.

 

During the two weeks up to 30 December there were 29 hospital outbreaks reported, compared to 70 in the previous fortnight, bringing the total of outbreaks for the season to 590.

 

Cases of norovirus have risen earlier than expected this winter season and this is a trend that has been seen across Europe and other parts of the world. It has not yet been determined why this has been the case and activity varies significantly from year to year.

 

John Harris, an expert in norovirus from the HPA said: “As we have seen in previous years there has been a dip in the number of confirmed laboratory reports owing to the Christmas and New Year period. However, in line with other norovirus seasons we will expect to see an increase in the number of laboratory reports in the next few weeks.

 

“Norovirus is very contagious, and anyone who has had it knows it is very unpleasant. If you think you may have the illness then it is important to maintain good hand hygiene to help prevent it spreading. We also advise that people stay away from hospitals, schools and care homes as these environments are particularly prone to outbreaks.”

 

Norovirus can be transmitted by contact with contaminated surfaces or objects, by contact with an infected person, or by the consumption of contaminated food or water. Symptoms of norovirus include a sudden onset of vomiting and/or diarrhoea. Some people may have a temperature, headache and stomach cramps. The illness usually resolves in one or two days and there are no long-term effects.

Ends

Notes to editors

  1. Indications from Europe and Japan are that norovirus activity also started to increase early. In Australia the norovirus season also peaks during the winter but this season it has gone on longer than usual and they are seeing cases into their summer. The HPA is following up with colleagues internationally.
  2. The number of laboratory confirmed cases represents just a fraction of the actual amount of norovirus activity as it is estimated that for each confirmed case, there are a further 288 unreported cases, as the vast majority of those affected do not seek healthcare services in response to their illness. Data from The Infectious Intestinal Diseases II (IID II) report can be found at the Food Standards Agency website [external link].

(Continue . . . )

 

 

For more on noroviruses, you may wish to revisit the following blogs.

 
Vomiting Larry And His Aerosolized Norovirus
An Unwanted Lagniappe From The Kitchen
UK: Norovirus Season Starts Early
»» Read More

UK: Three Whooping Cough Deaths In October

 

image

Credit CDC

 


# 6749

 

Whooping cough has been in the news (and in this blog) a lot this week (see Safety Of Tdap Vaccine In Older Patients and Waning Pertussis Vaccine Effectiveness Over Time), and with an announcement overnight from the HPA, today I go for the hat trick.

 

Last month (see The UK’s Whooping Cough Outbreak) we looked at the rising pertussis numbers in the UK, and the announcement that that pregnant women would be offered the Pertussis vaccine in order to protect their newborns, who cannot be vaccinated until they are 2 – 4 months of age.


 

The latest announcement from the HPA indicates that during the month of October more than 1,600 additional cases of Whooping cough were reported in England and Wales, resulting in 3 infant deaths.  This brings the death toll in 2012 to 13.

 

As you can see by the chart below, Pertussis in 2012 is running roughly 10 times the rate seen in recent years.

 

image

 

The reasons behind this latest spike in Pertussis cases are complex, and not completely understood, but some factors may include:

  • lower vaccination uptakes
  • the move away from whole cell pertussis vaccines to safer – but less broadly protective  - acellular vaccines in the 1990s
  • evolutionary changes in the Bordetella pertussis bacteria.

 

Here are some excerpts from the HPA’s press release:

 

Whooping cough cases continue to increase

30 November 2012

Figures published by the Health Protection Agency (HPA) today reveal 1,614 cases of whooping cough were reported in England and Wales in October 2012, bringing the total number of cases so far this year to 7,728*.

 

The total number of cases so far in 2012 (up to end of October) is nearly ten times higher than for the same period in 2008, the last ‘peak’ year before this current outbreak, when 797 cases were reported. There have been three deaths in infants with laboratory confirmed whooping cough reported in October bringing the total number of deaths in this age group so far this year to 13.

 

At the end of September, the Department of Health announced that pregnant women would be offered whooping cough vaccination to protect their newborn babies, who do not usually start their vaccinations against whooping cough until they are two months of age. The aim of the vaccination programme is to help to boost the short term immunity passed on by women to their babies while they are still in the womb.

 

Dr Gayatri Amirthalingam, consultant epidemiologist for immunisation at the HPA, said: “The October figures show a continuing rise in the overall number of whooping cough cases. While there has been a decline in the number of infant cases it’s important to emphasise that it’s too early to see any impact from the pregnancy vaccination programme. Working with the Department of Health we are continuing to carefully monitor whooping cough activity to evaluate the success of the programme.

 

“We strongly recommend all pregnant women take up the offer of vaccination. Parents should also ensure their children are vaccinated against whooping cough on time, even babies of women who’ve had the vaccine in pregnancy – this is to continue their baby’s protection through childhood. Parents should also be alert to the signs and symptoms of whooping cough – which include severe coughing fits accompanied by the characteristic “whoop” sound in young children but as a prolonged cough in older children or adults. It is also advisable to keep babies away from older siblings or adults who have the infection.”

 

Whooping cough, also known as pertussis, affects all ages. Young infants are at highest risk of severe complications and death from whooping cough as babies do not complete vaccination until they are around four months old. In older children and adults whooping cough can be an unpleasant illness but it does not usually lead to serious complications. Whooping cough is a highly infectious bacterial disease which spreads when a person with the infection coughs and sheds the bacteria which is then inhaled by another person.

(Continue . . . )

 

 

For more information, the CDC maintains an extensive Whooping Cough website, including audio files designed to help you identify the often distinctive `whooping’ sound made by those infected.

 

Pertussis (Whooping Cough)

Mother holding baby.

Pertussis, also known as whooping cough, is a highly contagious respiratory disease. It is caused by the bacterium Bordetella pertussis.

Pertussis is known for uncontrollable, violent coughing which often makes it hard to breathe. After fits of many coughs, someone with pertussis often needs to take deep breathes which result in a "whooping" sound. Pertussis most commonly affects infants and young children and can be fatal, especially in babies less than 1 year of age.

(Continue . . . )

»» Read More

Update: CCHF Patient In Scotland Dies

 

image

Global Distribution of CCHF – Credit WHO

 

# 6612

 

News this morning from the UK press that the 38-year old man who flew into Glasgow, Scotland earlier this week from the Middle East infected with CCHF (see Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Patient Isolated In Glasgow) has died overnight.

 

This report from the Independent, after which, I’ll have more.

 

Patient with rare fever dies in UK hospital

Lucinda Cameron  - Saturday 06 October 2012

A man being treated for Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever after returning to the UK from Afghanistan has died.

 

It is the first laboratory-confirmed case of CCHF in the UK, according to the Health Protection Agency (HPA).

 

Other passengers who sat close to him on an aircraft are undergoing daily health checks.

(Continue . . . )

 

 

Although originally hospitalized at Gartnavel General Hospital's Brownlee Centre, the unidentified patient was transferred yesterday to a high bio-security unit at London's Royal Free Hospital yesterday.

 

The following statement from the HPA was released yesterday, before the patient’s death.

 

Confirmed case of Crimean Congo Haemorrhagic Fever in the UK

5 October 2012

The Health Protection Agency (HPA) is aware of a laboratory confirmed case of Crimean-Congo Haemorrhagic Fever (CCHF) in a UK traveller who has recently returned from Afghanistan. The patient has been transferred from Glasgow, Scotland to the high security infectious diseases unit at the Royal Free hospital in London using specialist air transport.

CCHF is a serious viral disease which infects a range of domestic and wild animals. Humans are usually infected directly from the blood or body fluids of infected animals or via tick bites. The disease is endemic in many countries in Africa, parts of Europe, the Middle East and Asia.

CCHF can be acquired from an infected patient, but this requires direct contact with their blood or body fluids Therefore, there is no risk to the general population. As a precautionary measure, close contacts of the patient including hospital staff involved in the patient’s care have been contacted and will be monitored.

The HPA is providing public health, diagnostic and other support to the teams currently handling this incident.

This is the first laboratory-confirmed case of CCHF in the United Kingdom.

  • Information about the Crimean-Congo Haemorrhagic Fever is available on the HPA website. 
  • Information about the geographical distribution of CCHF is available on the HPA website.
  • Further information about the transmission of CCHF is available on the HPA website.
  • Information on CCHF is available from the World Health Organization (WHO) website [external link].
  • Visit the Royal Free Hospital website [external link].
  •  

    While the risk that this virus has been spread to others is considered low, the HPA will monitor close contacts of this patient for the next two weeks looking for any signs of infection.

    »» Read More

    UK: HPA Announcement On Novel Coronavirus Case

     

     image

    Credit Wikipedia

     

     

    # 6572

     

    The news is now coming at a faster pace on the novel coronavirus cases announced this morning by Saudi Arabia (see Details Emerge On (3) Saudi Coronavirus Cases).

     

    The HPA has now confirmed that one case, indeed, has travelled to the UK and is being treated, while another patient in the UK that died recently is being investigated (but has not been proven to have the same virus).

     

    It appears, however, that these cases have not all just suddenly emerged, but rather have been popping up (along with scattered reports of other serious respiratory illnesses in the Mideast, now under investigation) for several months.

     

    This from the HPA.

     

    Acute respiratory illness associated with a new virus identified in the UK

    23 September 2012

    The Health Protection Agency (HPA) can confirm the diagnosis of one laboratory confirmed case of severe respiratory illness associated with a new type of coronavirus. The patient, who is from the Middle East and recently arrived in the UK, is receiving intensive care treatment in a London hospital.

     

    In recent months, this new human coronavirus was also identified in a patient with acute respiratory illness in Saudi Arabia, who subsequently died.

     

    Coronaviruses are causes of the common cold but can also include more severe illness, such as the virus responsible for SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome). This new virus, however, is different from any that have previously been identified in humans. Preliminary enquiries have revealed no evidence of illness in contacts of these two cases, including healthcare workers. Based on what we know about other coronaviruses, many of these contacts will already have passed the period when they could have caught the virus from the infected person.

     

    We are also aware of a small number of other cases of serious respiratory illness in the Middle East in the past three months, one of whom was treated in the UK but has since died. This person's illness is also being investigated although there is no evidence at present to suggest that it is caused by the same virus or linked to the other two cases. No other confirmed cases have been identified to date in the UK

     

     

    Professor John Watson, head of the respiratory diseases department at the HPA, said: "The HPA is providing advice to healthcare workers to ensure the patient under investigation is being treated appropriately.

     

    "In the light of the severity of the illness that has been identified in the two confirmed cases, immediate steps have been taken to ensure that people who have been in contact with the UK case have not been infected, and there is no evidence to suggest that they have.

     

    "Further information about these cases is being developed for healthcare workers in the UK, as well as advice to help maintain increased vigilance for this virus. This information is also being shared with national and international authorities including the World Health Organization and the European Centre for Disease Control.

     

    "As we are aware of only two cases worldwide and there is no specific evidence of ongoing transmission, at present there is no specific advice for the public or returning travellers to take but we will share any further advice with the public as soon as more information becomes available."

    »» Read More

    UK: Probable Source Of Legionnaires Outbreak Indentified

    image

    Legionella Bacteria - Photo Credit CDC PHIL

     

    # 6461

     

    The outbreak of Legionella in the UK I wrote about last week (see HPA Updates The Stoke-On-Trent Legionella Outbreak) has expanded to 18 cases, and today the HPA has announced that they believe they have tracked down the bacteria’s source.

     

    It appears that 17 of the 18 cases visited a JTF Mega Discount Warehouse where hot tubs were displayed and sold.  Genetic fingerprinting has determined that the same strain of Legionella found in these patients was present in the hot tub.

     

    As this was a unique strain, not previously encountered, the odds are pretty good they’ve found the source.

     

    The legionella bacteria thrives in warm water, such as is often found in air-conditioning cooling towers, hot tubs, and even ornamental water fountains. Improper maintenance, or poor design, can lead to the bacteria blooming.

     

    When aerated the bacteria can become airborne, and if inhaled by a susceptible host, can cause a serious (and sometimes fatal) form of pneumonia. 

     

    This update comes from the HPA.

     

     

    Stoke-on-Trent Legionnaires’ Disease Outbreak – probable source identified

    30 July 2012

    Public and environmental health experts investigating the Legionnaires’ disease outbreak at Stoke-on-Trent believe they have identified a probable source.

     

    The probable source is a hot tub based at JTF Warehouse, City Road, Fenton, Stoke-on-Trent. We would like to emphasise that investigations are still ongoing. Environmental Health specialists from the Health and Safety Executive and Stoke-on-Trent City Council have taken and continue to take samples from sites across Stoke.

     

    A spokesperson from the Health and Safety Executive said: "HSE continues to inspect premises where we are the enforcing authority and will do so until we have eliminated those sites from our investigations and are sufficiently assured there are no other possible sources."

     

    The samples from the hot tub at JTF Warehouse were confirmed by the Health Protection Agency’s specialist laboratory in Colindale last night as being an unusual strain legionella bacteria. The strain matched those taken from patients. JTF warehouse are fully cooperating with the investigation.

     

    Dr Sue Ibbotson, regional director, Health Protection Agency West Midlands said: “We have identified the probable source of the Legionnaires' disease outbreak in Stoke. We have the evidence from DNA fingerprinting of samples from the hot tub and the patients being caused by the same previously unseen strain of legionella. The HPA also took detailed histories from the confirmed cases and we know that 17 of the 18 confirmed cases visited this warehouse in the two weeks before they fell ill. Added to that we know that spa pools are known to be effective mechanisms for spreading legionella infection.

     

    “We may still expect to see new cases of Legionnaires’ disease related to this outbreak. JTF Warehouse decommissioned the hot tub on 24 July. It can take up to two weeks following exposure for people to develop symptoms of Legionnaires’ disease and a further few days before they go to see their GP. We continue to work with our partners to investigate this outbreak and continue to take samples across the city in case there are other sites with the same strain of legionnella.”

    (Continue . . . )

     


    For an even more unusual source of Legionella, you may wish to revisit a blog from 2010 where we looked at a Study: Wiper Fluid And Legionella.

    »» Read More

    HPA Updates The Stoke-On-Trent Legionella Outbreak

     

    image

    Legionella Bacteria - Photo Credit CDC PHIL

    # 6450

     

    Yesterday Crof reported on the UK: Legionnaires' disease outbreak in Stoke-on-Trent that involved 7 patients hailing from that city in Staffordshire, England.

     

    Today, we’ve an update from the HPA indicates that two more cases have been identified, and that early microbiology testing is consistent with there being an (as yet, unidentified) common source.

     

     

    3.00pm update on Legionnaires' disease in Stoke-on-Trent

    25 July 2012

    Two further case of Legionnaires' disease have been confirmed in the Stoke-on-Trent outbreak bringing the total number of cases to nine. All those affected are between their late 40s and mid 70s and are being treated at University Hospital of North Staffordshire. The Health Protection Agency (HPA) is also investigating two cases identified in early summer as being possibly linked to the current cluster.

     

    Professor Harsh Duggal, Director of the Health Protection Unit in Stafford, said: “Early microbiology typing results back from the HPA laboratories show that samples taken from some of the patients look very similar so far and this is consistent with the cases having caught their infection from the same environmental source. We are taking detailed histories of the movements of the patients to see if there are similar patterns which would indicate a local source of infection.

    (Continue . . . )

     

     

    While an infectious pneumonia, Legionella is not a contagious disease.  It is transmitted environmentally, usually through water.

     

    Legionella got it’s name after it was identified as the bacterial cause of a large pneumonia outbreak at Philadelphia’s Bellevue Stratford Hotel during an American Legion convention in 1976.

     

    During this outbreak, 221 people were treated and 34 died.

     

    We now know Legionella to be a major cause of infectious pneumonia, and that it can sometimes spark large outbreaks of illness.  According to the CDC between 8,000 and 18,000 Americans are hospitalized with Legionnaire's Disease each year, although many more milder cases likely occur.

     

    For more information on the disease, the CDC maintains a fact sheet at Patient Facts: Learn More about Legionnaires' disease.

    The bacteria thrives in warm water, such as is often found in air-conditioning cooling towers, hot tubs, and even ornamental water fountains. Improper maintenance or poor design can lead to the bacteria blooming.

     

    When water is sprayed into the air the bacteria can become airborne, and if inhaled by a susceptible host, can cause a serious (and sometimes fatal) form of pneumonia.

     

    While large outbreaks of Legionella are often traced to specific causes, quite often the source of the infection for sporadic cases remains a mystery.  

     

    Today’s HPA announcement stresses that these cases are not hospital acquired, and that the authorities are working to identify the source.

    »» Read More

    More Tales From The Crypto

     

     


    # 6375

     

     

    A little more than a week ago, in Tales From The Crypto, I wrote about an HPA (Health Protection Agency) investigation into an unusually large number of gastrointestinal illnesses being reported across England due to the Cryptosporidium parasite, or as it is commonly called, “Crypto”.

     

    Over the past 7 days another 60 people have been diagnosed with this (generally) waterborne illness from the four regions of the North East, Yorkshire, West Midlands and East Midlands, bringing the total since early May to 327 (compared to 82 during the same period in 2011).

     

    While still elevated above normal, the number of new cases over the past week is less than was seen during the previous two weeks, and not all of these may be attributed to this outbreak.

     

    It is too soon to know if this outbreak has peaked.

     

    The source of infection has yet to be identified. Local water authorities reassure that there is no evidence of contamination of the public water supply.

     

    While generally thought of a waterborne illness, Crypto may be found in soil, food, water, or on surfaces that have been contaminated with the feces from infected humans or animals.

     

    image

    Photo Credit CDC PHIL

     

    Here is the latest Health Protection Agency update on the Crypto outbreak, followed by some prevention advice from the CDC.

     

    Update 8 June: Increase in cases of cryptosporidiosis

    8 June 2012

    The Health Protection Agency (HPA) continues to lead a multi-agency investigation to determine whether recent cases of cryptosporidiosis are linked to a common source.

     

    The English regions most affected by the increase in cases continue to be the North East, Yorkshire, West Midlands and East Midlands. An additional 60 cases of cryptosporidiosis have been confirmed across the four regions between 01 June and 07 June 2012, taking the total number of cases confirmed in these regions since 11 May 2012 to 327. This compares to 82 cases of the infection confirmed across the four regions within the same period the previous year (11 May 2011 to 07 June 2011).

     

    Most people affected had a mild to moderate form of illness and the HPA is not aware that any cases reported in the past week (since 1 June) have been hospitalised.

     

    So far investigations have not identified a likely source of infection. The Drinking Water Inspectorate has confirmed that there is currently no evidence that public water supplies are implicated.

     

    Cryptosporidiosis is caused by an organism called Cryptosporidium, which is found in soil, food, water or surfaces that have been contaminated with infected human or animal droppings. People can become infected by consuming contaminated water or food, by swimming in contaminated water, for example in lakes or rivers, or through contact with infected animals. The most common symptom is diarrhoea, which can range from mild to severe.

     

    Dr Stephen Morton, who is leading the investigation for the HPA, said: “The latest figures show that the sudden upturn in cases seen in May 2012 has not continued into the first week of June. The majority of cases became ill between 11 and 18 May. Whilst the increase is higher than we might expect at this time of year, it is not unusual to see an increase in cryptosporidiosis cases in the early summer and not all of the cases reported since 11 May are likely to be linked.

    (Continue . . . )

     

    Crypto infections occur around the globe, and according to an EID Journal study published last year, there are estimated to be nearly 750,000 Crypto infections in the United States each year (see Foodborne Illness Acquired in the United States—Major Pathogens).

     

    For most healthy individuals, a Crypto infection is an unpleasant, but not life threatening illness.  The most common symptoms (which generally last 1 to 2 weeks) are:

     

    • Watery Diarrhea
    • Stomach cramps or pain
    • Dehydration
    • Nausea
    • Vomiting
    • Fever
    • Weight loss

     

    Although rarely fatal in healthy individuals, `Crypto’ can be deadly for the very young, the very old, and those with compromised immune systems.

     

     


    All of which makes prevention key.  The CDC gives the following advice to reduce exposure to Crypto.

     

    Practice Good Hygiene
    Everywhere
    • Wash hands with soap and water for at least 20 seconds, rubbing hands together vigorously and scrubbing all surfaces:
      • Before preparing or eating food
      • After using the toilet
      • After changing diapers or cleaning up a child who has used the toilet
      • Before and after tending to someone who is ill with diarrhea
      • After handling an animal or animal waste
    At child care facilities
    • To reduce the risk of disease transmission, children with diarrhea should be excluded from child care settings until the diarrhea has stopped.
    At recreational water venues (pools, interactive fountains, lakes, ocean)
    • Protect others by not swimming if you are experiencing diarrhea (this is essential for children in diapers). If diagnosed with cryptosporidiosis, do not swim for at least 2 weeks after diarrhea stops.
    • Shower before entering the water.
    • Wash children thoroughly (especially their bottoms) with soap and water after they use the toilet or their diapers are changed and before they enter the water.
    • Take children on frequent bathroom breaks and check their diapers often.
    • Change diapers in the bathroom, not at the poolside.
    Around animals
    • Minimize contact with the feces of all animals, particularly young animals.
    • When cleaning up animal feces, wear disposable gloves, and always wash hands when finished.
    • Wash hands after any contact with animals or their living areas.
    Outside
    • Wash hands after gardening, even if wearing gloves.

    »» Read More

    The Legionella Outbreak in South West Edinburgh

    image

    Legionella Bacteria - Photo Credit CDC PHIL

     

    # 6370

     

    There’s a rapidly spreading outbreak of Legionella in Scotland this week,  and I’ve details from the NHS and HSE. 

     

    But first . . . a little background and history.

     

    In July of 1976, while many of us in the health care field were waiting for the expected arrival of a swine flu pandemic (see Deja Flu, All Over Again), another medical crisis was brewing  at the Bellevue Stratford Hotel in Philadelphia.

     

    This was the scene of the gathering of hundreds of veterans belonging to the American Legion, celebrating this country’s bicentennial.  Within a couple of days of their arrival, scores fell ill with a serious flu-like illness.

     

    At first, many believed this was the first arrival of the expected flu pandemic, but soon it became evident that this was something else entirely.  But exactly what it was would take months to determine.

     

    During this outbreak, 221 people were treated and 34 died.

     

    But it wouldn’t be until early in 1977 that a definitive cause would be isolated by the CDC a Gram negative, aerobic bacteria found growing in the hotel’s air-conditioning cooling tower – that provoked a serious form of pneumonia.

     

    Dubbed `Legionnaire's Disease’ by the press, this bacterium was named Legionella, and the pneumonia it produces Legionellosis.

     

    While `discovered’ in 1976 and identified the following year, Legionella had been with us, and causing serious illness, for a long time. It had caused earlier outbreaks, including one in Austin, Minnesota in 1957 (Osterholm et al., 1983) and at Saint Elizabeth’s Hospital in Washington, D.C. in 1965.  

     

    The cause of these outbreaks wasn’t identified, however, until retrospective studies were conducted after the Philadelphia outbreak.  

     

    We now know Legionella to be a major cause of infectious pneumonia, and that it sometimes sparks large outbreaks of illness.  According to the CDC between 8,000 and 18,000 Americans are hospitalized with Legionnaire's Disease each year, although the actual number of infected is likely higher.

     

    All of which serves as prelude to the following report on the rising number of Legionella cases being diagnosed this week in Edinburgh Scotland.

     

    As of today, the Associated Press is reporting 51 confirmed cases (link), one death, and more cases are expected to turn up.

     

    So far, the source of this environmental pneumonia has not been identified.

     

    image

     

    Running point in the investigation is NHS Lothian, which is the public health authority for the Edinburgh area. 

     

    The first press release on this outbreak came 4 days ago with the announcement of the first four cases. The next day there were six,  and the day after that . . . thirteen. 

     

    Now the number stands at 51, and at least 10 more suspected cases are being tested.

     

    You can read the progression of daily reports by the NHS at the link below, with the last update from yesterday.

     

    Outbreak of Legionella in South West Edinburgh - Last updated 07/06/2012 AM

    Update - 07/06/2012 AM

    The Cabinet Secretary for Health & Wellbeing made a statement on the Legionella Outbreak at the Scottish Parliament this morning. You can watch it online at 

    http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/newsandmediacentre/30912.aspx


    Update - 06/06/2012

    Resilience team report on outbreak latest

    The latest reports from the Scottish Government Resilience Room (SGoRR) on the Edinburgh Legionnaires’ outbreak show that there are now 21 confirmed cases and 19 suspected cases.

     

    One of the confirmed cases has died, two have been discharged from hospital and 12 are being treated in intensive care.

     

    An emergency information leaflet will be delivered to all homes and businesses in affected areas tomorrow. GPs have also been provided with information on spotting the signs of infection.

     

    A dedicated NHS helpline has been set up for anyone concerned and can be reached on 0800 0858 531.

     

    Health Secretary Nicola Sturgeon said:

     

    “The fact remains that the risk to the general public is low – however, due to the incubation period of the infection we are still expecting to see an increase in cases over the next couple of days.

    (Continue . . . )

     

     

    Obviously these numbers continue to rise, and press reports now differ from the numbers posted above.

     

    The NHS maintains the following  website with more information on Legionella:

     

    Legionnaires' disease

    Introduction

    Legionnaires’ disease is a potentially fatal lung infection (pneumonia) that is caused by the legionella bacteria. Legionnaires’ disease is caught by breathing in small droplets of contaminated water. It is not contagious and cannot be spread directly from person to person.

     

    Initial symptoms include a high fever and muscle pain. Once the bacteria begin to infect your lungs, you may also develop a persistent cough (see Legionnaires disease - symptoms). Prompt treatment using antibiotics is essential to reduce the risk of death. See Legionnaires’ disease - treatment for more information.

    (Continue . . . )

     

     

    To put this in context, the largest outbreak of Legionnaires disease in recent years in the UK occurred a decade ago, in the town center of Barrow-in-Furness, Cumbria which ultimately produced 180 known infections, and 7 deaths.

     

    The following 62-page report on that outbreak is available on the HSE website:

     

    Report of the public meetings into the legionella outbreak in Barrow-in-Furness, August 2002PDF

     


    While doctors struggle to treat those infected, disease detectives in Scotland are working to find the environmental source of this virulent bacteria, in order to stop the outbreak.

     

    I’ll update this story when new details emerge.

    »» Read More

    HPA: Healthcare-Associated Infection (HCAI) Survey

     


    # 6340

     

    The UK’s HPA has released a comprehensive survey of antimicrobial use, and HCAI (Healthcare-Associated Infections), across 114 hospitals (99 NHS acute trusts and 5 independent sector organizations), providing us with a snapshot of conditions between September and November 2011.

     

    Although the full global burden of HCAIs or HAIs (Hospital Acquired Infections) is unknown and underappreciated, even in countries with modern healthcare facilities they constitute a major threat to life and health.

     

    The following is an oft quoted assessment from the CDC on HAI’s (Hospital Acquired Infections) in the United States back in 2010.

    A new report from CDC updates previous estimates of healthcare-associated infections. In American hospitals alone, healthcare-associated infections account for an estimated 1.7 million infections and 99,000 associated deaths each year. Of these infections:

    • 32 percent of all healthcare-associated infection are urinary tract infections
    • 22 percent are surgical site infections
    • 15 percent are pneumonia (lung infections)
    • 14 percent are bloodstream infections

     

    The subject of HAIs is often addressed by Maryn McKenna on her excellent Superbug Blog, and was a major focus of her book SUPERBUG: The Fatal Menace Of MRSA. Both are highly recommended.

     

    The HPA is working to reduce the incidence of HAIs in the UK, and according to their latest report, progress has been made. The greatest reductions have been made in MRSA bloodstream infections and C. difficile infections.

     

    Of special note, Enterobacteriaceae (includes E. coli, Klebsiella spp.,Enterobacter spp. and others) were the most frequently reported organisms associated with HCAI, infecting roughly .9% of the patient population, and making up nearly 1/3rd of all infections.

     

    Links to the 140 page preliminary report, 144 page appendices, and a 16  page FAQ at the link below.

     

    English National Point Prevalence Survey on Healthcare-associated Infections and Antimicrobial Use, 2011: preliminary data

    English PPS on HCAI and AMU 2011

    Authors:

    HPA

    Publication date: May 2012

    Synopsis

    The Health Protection Agency (HPA) coordinated the fourth National Point Prevalence Survey (PPS) on healthcare-associated infection (HCAI) and first National PPS on antimicrobial use (AMU) in England. This survey is not directly comparable to previous surveys.

     

    The aims of the PPS were to determine the burden of HCAI and AMU in acute hospitals and to use the results to identify priority areas for the future.

    Key points

    • The prevalence of healthcare-associated infections (HCAI) was 6.4% in 2011 compared to 8.2% in 2006.
    • The most frequent HCAIs detected were respiratory tract, urinary tract and surgical site infections.
    • The prevalence of antimicrobial use (AMU) was 34.7%. This is the first time AMU was measured nationally. This provides a baseline for future monitoring.
    • The prevalence of HCAIs, AMU and device use was highest in intensive care units, which relates in part to the complexity and vulnerability of patients in this setting.

    Download full publication

    English National Point Prevalence Survey on Healthcare-Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Use, 2011 - Appendices (PDF, 3.3 MB)

     

    PPS Frequently Asked Questions (PDF, 654 KB)

     

    English National Point Prevalence Survey on Healthcare-associated Infections and Antimicrobial Use, 2011 (PDF, 1.9 MB)

     

    While there is much to be gleaned from these reports, a few highlights from the FAQ include:

     

     

    3.1 What is the overall prevalence of HCAI in English hospitals?

    The overall prevalence of HCAI in acute hospitals was 6.4%.The prevalence in NHS acute trusts was 6.5% Independent sector organisation had a lower prevalence of HCAI of 2.2%.

    It is not appropriate to compare the prevalence between these hospital types because they represent distinct case mixes, patient populations and specialties. Further the numbers included were very small in paediatric and independent hospitals and these results should be interpreted with caution.


    3.2 Does a prevalence of 6.4% mean that if I go in to hospital I have a one in sixteen chance of getting a HCAI?

    No. This means that at any time one in sixteen inpatients in hospital will have a HCAI. A prevalence survey counts the number of patients with HCAI at any point in time.

    People with HCAI tend to stay in hospital longer and those patients who stay in hospital for longer periods of treatment tend to be more seriously ill and therefore more at risk of contracting HCAI. The large majority of patients are successfully treated in hospital and go home without acquiring a HCAI.


    3.3 Can you tell me what my chance is of contracting HCAI during my hospital stay?


    No. This is not shown by the current prevalence survey. In order to calculate how likely a person is to get a HCAI an incidence study would be required. This would look at all patients who were treated within the hospital on a regular basis over a defined time period.

     

     

     

     

    The other focus of this survey was to determine the level of AMU (Antimicrobial Usage) in acute care hospitals in England.  The report found:

     

    The overall prevalence of AMU was 34.7%. The prevalence of AMU was greatest in the independent sector hospitals (46.7%) compared with NHS organisations at 34.3%. The prevalence of AMU in adults was 35.3% and in paediatrics 28.7%. AMU prevalence was greatest in ICU at 60.8%.


    The total number of antimicrobials prescribed in the survey was 25,942 for 18,219 (34.7%) patients, which equates to 1.4 AM per patient prescribed antimicrobials. AMU were most frequently prescribed for community acquired infections (53.0%). Thirteen percent of patients were on an antimicrobial (AM) for surgical prophylaxis; 30.3% of surgical prophylaxis was administered for greater than one day.

     

    The majority of AMU was for respiratory tract infections (30.9%). The second most common reason for AMU was skin, soft tissue, bone and joint infections (19.0%).

     


    The use of a standardized survey technique should go a long ways towards developing better year-to-year comparisons of HCAIs and AMU in UK facilities, and will facilitate comparisons with other EU countries that have adopted similar surveys.

    »» Read More

    UK: Civil Threat Risk Assessment

     

    image

    # 6232

     

     

    When thinking about the types of disasters that individuals, families, businesses, and communities ought to be preparing for it is useful to look at the threats that governments perceive as being of `high priority’.

     

    Since 2008 the UK government has produced, and updated every two years, a National Risk Register For Civil Emergencies – essentially a short list of disaster scenarios (man-made & natural) that the Cabinet Office believe to be genuine threats.

     

    They define a `CIVIL EMERGENCY’ as:

     

    • an event or situation which threatens serious damage to human welfare in a place in the United Kingdom – where serious damage is defined as ‘loss of human life; human illness or injury; homelessness; damage to property; disruption of a supply of money, food, water, energy or fuel; disruption of a system of communication; disruption of facilities for transport; or disruption of services relating to health’ 
    • an event or situation which threatens serious damage to the environment of a place in the United Kingdom – where environmental damage is deined a‘contamination of land, water or air with biological, chemical or radio-active matter,or disruption or destruction of plant life or animal life’, and/or
    • war, or terrorism, which threatens serious damage to the security of the United Kingdom.

    Threats are evaluated based on the likelihood of it happening over the next five years, and on severity of impact it would be expected to produce.

     

    The damage and impact estimates used in this report represent a `reasonable worst case’ which exclude `highly implausible scenarios’.

     

    While prudent for most disaster planning - as Japan learned last year with their combination 9.0 earthquake, 30+ Meter Tsunami, and multiple nuclear reactor failures – sometimes the reality can exceed `reasonable’ expectations.

     

    As far as what the Cabinet Office views as the greatest threats to the UK over the next five years?  Number one on their hit parade is . . . you guessed it:

     

     

    Pandemic influenza – This remains the most significant civil emergency risk. The outbreak of H1N1 influenza in 2009 (‘swine flu’) did not match the severity of the scenario that we plan for and is not necessarily indicative of future pandemic influenzas; the three influenza pandemics of the 20th century (1918–19, 1957–58 and 1968–69) all had differing levels of severity. The 2009 H1N1 pandemic does not change the risk of another pandemic emerging (such as an H5N1 (avian flu)
    pandemic) or mean that the severity of any future pandemics will be the same as the 2009 H1N1 outbreak.

     

    Also on their list is a repeat of the 1953 severe coastal flooding event that claimed hundreds of lives and caused extreme property damage and a catastrophic terrorist attack.

     

    New this year are the addition of Volcanic threats and the potential impact from severe space weather.

     

    You may be wondering about the inclusion of a Volcanic threat to a country that isn’t exactly known for its volcanoes. Their concern stems from the impact of volcanic eruptions outside of their country – notably, in Iceland. Specifically they cite:

     

    Severe effusive (gas-rich) volcanic eruptions abroad – The 2010 eruption of the Eyjafjallajökull volcano in Iceland showed some of the consequences that a volcanic eruption abroad can have on the UK and its citizens. Following consultation with geological and meteorological experts about the potential risks the UK faces from volcanic eruptions in Iceland or elsewhere, the assessment is that there are two main kinds of risk from volcanic eruptions. The irst is an ash-emitting eruption, similar to that in 2010. The second, which is slightly less likely than an ash-emitting eruption, but which could have widespread impacts on health, agriculture and transport, is an effusive-style eruption on the scale of the 1783–84 Laki eruption in Iceland. This second type of eruption is now one of the highest priority risks in the NRA and the NRR.

     

     

    In 1783 the Craters of Laki in Iceland erupted and over the next 8 months spewed clouds of clouds of deadly hydrofluoric acid & Sulphur Dioxide, killing over half of Iceland’s livestock and roughly 25% of their population.


    These noxious clouds drifted over Europe, and resulted in widespread crop failures and thousands of deaths from direct exposure to these fumes. There are also anecdotal reports that suggest this eruption had short-term global climate impacts as well.

     

    Another eruption of the type and scale seen in 1783 could present an enormous disaster scenario not only to the UK, but to all of Europe.

     

    Also added this year (to coincide with the Solar Maximum expected in 2013) is the inclusion of Severe Space Weather as a national threat.

     

    severe space weather – Space weather covers a range of different phenomena, including solar fares, coronal mass ejections and solar energetic particle
    events. Severe space weather can cause disruption to a range of technologies and infrastructure, including communications systems, electronic circuits and power grids. The ‘reasonable worst case’ for a severe space weather event is based on the so-called Carrington Event in 1859, which saw some of the largest space weather phenomena ever recorded.

     

    image

    While sounding a bit like science-fiction, Solar flares and CMEs are also on FEMA’s radar scope, and are subjects we’ve discussed before:

     

    A Flare For The Dramatic
    Solar Storms, CMEs & FEMA
    A Carrington Event

     

     

    NASA, while admitting that a serious solar storm could happen practically anytime, also cautions that the next big one could be many decades away. It is a genuine threat, they say, but the timing is impossible to predict. 

     

    The entire 58-page UK risk assessment makes for fascinating reading and can be downloaded from the Cabinet Office website (below):

     

    National Risk Register

    In 2008 Government published, for the first time, a National Risk Register, fulfilling a commitment made in the National Security Strategy. This was the first step in providing advice on how people and businesses can better prepare for civil emergencies.
    The January 2012 update to this document; the National Risk Register of Civil Emergencies- January 2012 edition has been published to update the public on the Government’s current assessment of the likelihood and potential impact of a range of different civil emergency risks ( including naturally and accidently occurring hazards and malicious threats) that may directly affect the UK. It also provides information on how the UK and emergency services prepare for these emergencies.

    A wider review of how people and businesses can better prepare for civil emergencies, involving consultation with risk communication experts is underway. The January 2012 version therefore does not include guidance on how to prepare for emergencies. Whilst this review is underway chapter 3 and 4 of the 2010 edition of the NRR (see below) should be used as guidance on how people and businesses can better prepare for emergencies.

    Downloads
    National Risk Register for Civil Emergencies – January 2012 Edition (pdf, 949kb)

    File type: PDF - Portable Document format | File size: 948.78 kB

     

     

     

    While individually the odds of seeing a `Carrington Event’, or a repeat of the Laki eruptions, or a catastrophic terrorist attack in the UK are probably low, when you combine the threats, the odds of `something bad’ happening over the next five years go up.

     

    Which is why individual, family, and community `All threats’ preparedness makes a lot of sense.

     

    Whether you live in the United States, the UK, or anywhere else in the world, you can find good preparedness information at the following links:

     

    FEMA http://www.fema.gov/index.shtm

    READY.GOV http://www.ready.gov/

    AMERICAN RED CROSS http://www.redcross.org/

     

    And lastly, you may wish to revisit some of my preparedness essays, including:

     

    In An Emergency, Who Has Your Back?

    An Appropriate Level Of Preparedness

    »» Read More

    UK: Updated Pandemic Influenza Plan

     

     

     

    image

     

    # 5952

     

    Today the UK government released a 70-page updated pandemic contingency plan which incorporates some of the lessons learned from the 2009 swine flu pandemic.

     

    The PDF Document is available for download from the Department of Health.

     

    While I’ve only had time to give it a cursory glance, one of the major goals is to reduce the economic and societal impact of any pandemic response. 

     

    An excerpt from the plan follows:

     
    Business as usual

    7.4 During a pandemic, the Government will encourage those who are well to carry on with
    their normal daily lives for as long and as far as  that is possible, whilst taking basic precautions to protect themselves from infection and lessen the risk of spreading influenza to others (see Chapter 4). The UK Government does not plan to close
    borders, stop mass gatherings or impose controls on public transport during any pandemic. 

     

     

    While conceding that pandemic severity is hugely unpredictable, this report shies away focusing on `worst case scenarios’.

     

    A couple of examples: They envision no widespread school closings, and a recommend a more conservative approach in the use and distribution of antiviral medications than we saw in 2009.

     

    While a mild or moderate pandemic is admittedly the most likely scenario, how well their plans to maintain `business as usual’ would hold up under a severe pandemic conditions remains to be seen.

     

    For more on this, the UK Department of Health has a press release  regarding the publication of this new plan.

    »» Read More

    Another Yank From Oxford

     

     

     

     

    # 5863

     

     

    The 2010-2011 flu season across much of the northern hemisphere was unremarkable, but there were a few notable exceptions. The UK saw a dramatic resurgence of the 2009 H1N1 virus in December of 2010, stressing hospital ICUs across Britain.

     

    According to the HPA’s figures . . . with the exception of the swine flu pandemic of 2009 . . .  last year’s flu epidemic in Great Britain was the worst in nearly a decade.

     

    image

    These, and many other flu graphics, are available from HPA Weekly National Influenza Graphs (PDF, 687 KB).

     

    North America in contrast, which was dominated by the H3N2 virus, saw a relatively mild flu epidemic last year.  Despite that, flu claimed thousands of American lives last year.

     

    Giving further evidence that influenza is notoriously unpredictable. Even during the same year, the strains and severity can vary widely across the globe.

     

    Still, this time of year many scientists look towards the slowly waning flu season south of the equator for clues as to how the northern hemisphere will fare this year.

     

    As you might expect, the picture is mixed.  The following graphic comes from the World Health Organization’s  latest influenza surveillance report.

     

    image

     

    Influenza activity in South Africa and much of South America peaked early in their season and is on the decline (influenza B, however, is still circulating in parts of Africa at significant levels).

     

    Australia and New Zealand are reporting continued, and relatively heavy, influenza activity.

     

    The following graph comes from the latest Australian Influenza Surveillance report, and the pattern is similar to the one we saw in the first graphic from the HPA. 

    image

    Influenza activity this year (with the exception of the 2009 pandemic) is the highest they’ve recorded in recent years.  According to this report, so far:

     

    . . .  in 2011, 14,222 (71%) cases were reported as influenza A (35% influenza A (untyped), 31%
    pandemic (H1N1) 2009
    and 5% A/H3N2) and 5,620 (28%) were influenza B.

     

    All of which serves as prelude to a report today in the UK Express Newspaper, featuring interviews with several noted virologists including John Oxford - Scientific Director of Retroscreen Virology Ltd. and a Professor of Virology at St Bartholomew’s and the Royal London Hospital.

     

    In the UK, when the press wants a quote or opinion on influenza or pandemic issues, you’ll find it often comes from Professor Oxford. 

     

    At the start of the influenza pandemic of 2009 Oxford was publicly insisting that the real number of infected from the H1N1 virus in the UK was many times greater than the British government was saying (see A Yank From Oxford).

     

    As it turned out, he was right. 

     

    Today we have:

     

    KILLER FLU TO GRIP BRITAIN

    Many Britons have little immunity after two years of relatively limited outbreaks

    Monday September 26,2011

     

    Hyperbolic headlines aside (a `killer flu’ hits Britain every year. It’s really just a matter of degree), Professor Oxford is quoted as saying:

     

    “No one is sure why our patterns of flu tend to follow what happens in the southern hemisphere during the summer but it does.

     

    Unfortunately in Australia there has been a sharp outbreak with higher than normal numbers of flu strains A and B.

     

    The chances are the same will happen here.”

     

    He qualifies his statement later by saying that they really won’t know how the UK will fare until later in the year.

     

    But even without the elevated flu levels reported in Australia, Oxford is concerned over a resurgence of Influenza B which as been overshadowed the past couple of years by the A/H1N1 strain.  

     

    Community immunity to the B strain may be declining, and the virus can cause serious illness, particularly in the very young and very old.

     

     

    Other scientists interviewed in this article are less willing to predict how the upcoming flu season will evolve, although all admit a heavy flu season is possible.

     

    All of this comes amid controversy over the UK government’s decision not to publicly push their “Catch it. Kill it. Bin it” flu hygiene advertising campaign, or run PSAs encouraging vaccination.

     

    Instead, the NHS is relying on a targeted flu vaccination plan for `at-risk’ populations through their network of GPs.

     

    Another controversy is that only about a third of Health Care Workers (HCWs) in Britain voluntarily accepted the flu vaccine last year.

     

    Professor Lindsey Davies, president of the UK Faculty of Public Health, calls that a “complete dereliction of duty” and warns that it could endanger the lives of `at-risk patients such as babies, the elderly, pregnant women and those with breathing trouble.’

     

    Flu apathy, particularly in the wake of a pandemic that failed to live up to some people’s expectations, runs high in the UK and around the world.

     

    Last year’s flu headlines (see The Pandemic Is Ended (But The Malady Lingers On) are all-but-forgotten, replaced by the latest crisis of the week.  It is hard for most people to worry about a flu that may come later this winter when the economy already appears to have pneumonia.

     

    And so we find ourselves on the cusp of another flu season, peering ahead, but without much of a clue as to how it will pan out. 

     

    The only certainty is that the flu will arrive – more or less on schedule – and even if it isn’t severe, it will sicken millions, hospitalize hundreds of thousands, and kill tens of thousands around the world.

     

    Influenza can kill you, even in a `light’ flu season.

     

    Reason enough to get a flu vaccine every year, and to practice good flu hygiene (covering coughs, sneezes, washing hands, staying home when sick, etc.) year round.

     

    No, they are not guaranteed protection.  But they can give you a decided edge against a serious virus.

     

    For more on influenza, vaccines, and prevention, I would invite you to visit:

    image

    »» Read More