Showing posts with label Novel Flu Virus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Novel Flu Virus. Show all posts

Novel Viruses & Chekhov’s Gun

 

 


# 6475

 

 

Although the attribution is suspect, there is an old adage in literary circles – credited most often to Russian playwright Anton Chekhov – that if you show a gun hanging on the wall in the first act, it absolutely must go off by the third.

 

It is such a well used device, that I suspect it leads many people to believe we are on the brink of a pandemic every time a novel influenza virus is reported in humans.

 

Fortunately, emerging infectious diseases are not compelled to follow the dictums of modern literary convention. New flu viruses are constantly cropping up in humans, but only rarely do they portend a pandemic.

With headlines last month on a novel H3N8 `Seal flu’ with supposed pandemic potential, and several small clusters of H3N2v swine flu infections in the Midwest over the past few weeks, today seemed like a good day take a historical look at a few viral contenders that tried, and failed, to spark a pandemic.

Novel flu viruses are most likely to be zoonotic; jumping from another animal species to man, either directly, or through an intermediary host, or via reassortment. 

image

Over the past 100 years, we’ve seen four of these viral jumps spark a pandemic. The H1N1 pandemic of 1918, the H2N2 pandemic of 1957, H3N2 in 1968, and novel H1N1 in 2009.

Flu Timeline 2010

But interspersed among these global pandemics have been numerous novel viruses that have infected humans and yet ultimately failed to produce a pandemic.

 

The most obvious example is the H5N1 virus, which first appeared 15 years ago in Hong Kong - and after a 5 year hiatus - returned in 2003.

 

Since that time has infected more than 600 people.

 

Yet despite morphing into more than 20 distinct clades, and spreading from Asia to Europe and the Middle East, this virus remains poorly adapted to human physiology and has (thus far) proved incapable of sparking a pandemic.

 

The caveat being, that this could change.

 

H5N1, like all flu viruses, is constantly evolving.  As long as it is out there, it poses a potential pandemic threat.


Similarly, we’ve seen scattered human infections by the H9N2 avian virus, and sporadic attempts by various strains of the H7 avian virus to jump to man.

 

  • In 2003 an outbreak of H7N7 at a poultry farm in the Netherlands went on to infect at least 89 people. Most of the victims were only mildly affected, but one person died.
  • In 2004 two people in British Columbia tested positive for H7N3 (see Health Canada Report) during an outbreak that resulted in the culling of 19 million birds.
  • In 2006 and 2007 there were a small number of human infections in Great Britain caused by H7N3 (n=1)  and H7N2 (n=4), again producing mild symptoms.

 

But beyond these avian strains, we’ve seen human adapted flu viruses that have threatened – but ultimately failed – to spark a pandemic.

 

The first example comes from shortly after the end of WWII with what would become known as the `pseudo-pandemic’ or vaccine failure of 1947.

 

Fearing that crowded ships and barracks could give rise to a reprise of the 1918 pandemic, the United States Military  commissioned Dr. Thomas Francis of the University of Michigan and his protégé Jonas Salk to come up with a viable influenza vaccine in 1943.

 

Within a year a vaccine based on the 1934 and 1943 flu strains was in wide use in the military, and for several years the Francis/Salk vaccine worked well.

 

But in 1947, a new variant of the H1N1 virus appeared on military bases in Japan,and quickly spread from there infecting hundreds of millions around the globe (see 2002 PNAS article).

 

While it produced a generally mild illness, and few excess deaths, this new strain apparently had drifted enough antigenically to evade both the vaccine and community immunity acquired from earlier strains.

 

Had it been more virulent, the 1947 flu virus might well have been considered a pandemic.  Today it is barely remembered, except by virologists.

 

Four years later, a far more ominous flu strain made a brief appearance during the 1950-51 flu season.

 

For about six weeks, a highly virulent influenza erupted in Liverpool, England and then spread across the UK and to Eastern Canada.

 

For a time, it was as deadly as the 1918 pandemic.

image

This startling graphic comes from the March 16th, 1951 Proceedings of The Royal Society of Medicine – page 19 – and shows in detail the tremendous spike in influenza deaths in early 1951 over the (admittedly, unusually mild) 1948 flu season. 

 

The CDC's EID Journal  has a stellar account of this 1951 event, and is very much worth reading.

 

Viboud C, Tam T, Fleming D, Miller MA, Simonsen L. 1951 influenza epidemic, England and Wales, Canada, and the United States. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2006 Apr [date cited].

 

Despite its virulence, and obvious ability to spread efficiently from human-to-human, this virus died out as suddenly and mysteriously as it appeared.  

 

It remains a medical mystery.

 

Fast forward to  February 1976, and a young recruit at Ft. Dix, New Jersey fell ill and died from a virus that was later isolated and dubbed A/New Jersey/76 (Hsw1N1).

 

This swine-flu virus went on to infect more than 200 soldiers on the base, and caused severe respiratory disease in 13 of them. How and why it appeared in New Jersey remains unknown.

 

While the death rate was very low, this virus appeared to easily transmissible among humans. This led to the swine flu pandemic scare of 1976, which I chronicled several years ago in Deja Flu, All Over Again. 

 

The feared swine flu pandemic never materialized, and for reasons we cannot explain, the virus simply disappeared.

 

In the `close but no cigar’ category,  a year later we did see an epidemic - at least among children - with the return of the H1N1 virus after a 20 year absence. It was dubbed the `Russian Flu’, as it was believed to have escaped from a Russian research laboratory.

 

Given the limits of testing and surveillance, there have most certainly been other failed viruses – of which we are unaware – that simply `flu beneath our radar’. 

 

In recent years we’ve also seen a number of  non-flu viruses, such as the 2003 SARS outbreak, Clusters Of HEV68 Respiratory Infections, and various adenovirus outbreaks, that have produced illness and concerns, but no pandemic.

 

None of this tells us what will become of the H3N2v swine flu virus, or any of the other novel strains that are currently out there. Another pandemic will occur.  We just don’t know when, or from what source.

 

But it does provide some perspective.

 

While all pandemics are caused by novel viruses, not all novel viruses produce pandemics.

 

Emerging viruses deserve our attention and respect, and H3N2v is certainly no exception. In time, this variant virus may prove to be a significant public health threat.

 

But as we watch these myriad novel viruses crop up around the globe, it should provide some solace to remember: history shows us that in the world of emerging infectious diseases . . .

 

. . .  by the time act III comes along – we often find that Chekhov’s gun is loaded with blanks.

»» Read More

WHO Comment: Testing For Novel Flu Viruses

 

 

image

H3N2 influenza virions –CDC PHIL

# 6019

 

 

The recent detection of a handful of novel swine-origin influenza infections across four US states is a reminder that influenza viruses continue to mix and match and evolve, and that new (and potentially dangerous strains) can appear with little warning.

 

While the CDC states that these S-OIV trH3N2 viruses have yet to demonstrate an ability to spread efficiently among the human population - and therefore don’t currently pose a major public health threat - the concern is that over time they could obtain that capability.

 

So agencies like the CDC, the ECDC, the World Health Organization, and others are encouraging a heightened awareness and vigilance in the testing and reporting on any unusual (or un-subtypable) flu cases.

 

The following notice was posted on the WHO’s influenza page late yesterday (hat tip AlohaOR on the Flu Wiki).

 

 

 

WHO Comment on the importance of global monitoring of variant influenza viruses

19 December 2011

Human infections with variant influenza viruses

Recently, several human infections with variant influenza viruses currently thought to be circulating in swine populations have been reported. To date, epidemiological investigations have not revealed any onward transmission of these viruses outside of small clusters. Avian influenza H5N1 viruses also continue to cause infections in humans exposed to infected birds and contaminated environments especially in countries where the virus is considered endemic in poultry. Thus far, transmission of these variant viruses from animals to humans has only resulted in sporadic human cases or small clusters among close contacts, with no evidence of community level spread. These sporadic human cases and small clusters of human infection with variant influenza viruses are expected and are not considered unusual, and do not change WHO’s current assessment of pandemic risk.

 

However, because influenza viruses are unpredictable, they have the possibility to change and become more transmissible among humans as shown by the emergence of the influenza pandemic H1N1 virus in 2009. For this reason, continued monitoring of the occurrence of human infections with these viruses and characterization of the viruses themselves are critically important to assess their pandemic potential.

 

WHO reminds Member countries that it is an obligation under the International Health Regulations (IHR) to report to WHO all human cases of infection with influenza viruses that are not currently circulating seasonally in human populations (http://www.who.int/ihr/survellance_response/case_definitions/en/index.html), and to conduct epidemiological investigations around each case to identify or rule out any onward human-to-human spread which could indicate emergence of a more transmissible virus. WHO will continue to share information about variant influenza viruses with the international public health community in accordance with WHO's obligations under the IHR.

 

WHO also strongly recommends that all un-subtypable influenza A specimens should be immediately sent for diagnosis and further characterization to specialized laboratories or one of the six WHO Collaborating Centres for Reference & Research on Influenza (http://www.who.int/influenza/resources/documents/diagnostic_recommendations/en/index.html),

This is important for early identification of emerging viruses with the potential to threaten global public health.

 

 

It isn’t just the S-OIV trH3N2 virus that concerns health authorities. The H5N1 bird flu virus, avian H9N2, along with some H7 and H11 strains of avian influenza have all demonstrated some ability to infect humans. 

 

While none have yet managed to adapt well enough to human physiology to spread efficiently, the CDC and public health officials are obviously taking these novel virus detections seriously, and are encouraging enhanced global surveillance to track their evolution and spread.

 

It is too soon to know whether any of these new flu strains will take hold in the human population.

 

As I wrote in Pseudo Pandemics And Viral Interlopers it is certainly possible for new strains of influenza to appear and circulate among humans, without sparking a pandemic.

 

For now, we are in a watchful waiting mode; looking for signs that one of these novel viruses is getting better adapted to human physiology.

 

In the meantime, maintaining good flu hygiene this winter (washing/sanitizing your hands, covering coughs & sneezes, staying home when sick), and getting your seasonal flu shot, remain the best strategies to avoid getting sick during this flu season.

 

Update:  I noted shortly after posting this blog that Helen Branswell of the Canadian Press has an article on this WHO release as well.

 

Keep an eye out for new flu viruses: WHO

12/19/2011  | Helen Branswell, The Canadian Press

»» Read More

CDC Confirms 2 More Novel Flu Infections

 

image

H3N2 influenza virions –CDC PHIL


# 6001

 

 

The CDC announced today the detection of two new novel flu isolates; one in West Virginia (trH3N2) and another in Minnesota (A/H1N2).

 

The West Virginia virus isolate is described today by the CDC as being:

 

A novel influenza A (H3N2) virus with genes from swine, human, and avian lineages with the M gene from the 2009 H1N1 virus that was first identified in August 2011. Ten prior human infections with this virus in four other states have been confirmed.

 

This virus is distantly related to an H3N2 virus that circulated 20+ years ago, which may explain why those born after 1990 have made up vast majority of cases detected so far.

 

Earlier posts on those cases include:

 

Branswell On The New trH3N2 Flu Virus
CIDRAP: New Details In The trH3N2 Story
ECDC Risk Assessment On trH3N2 Cases In North America
CDC Update On Iowa trH3N2 Cases

 

The Minnesota isolate is an H1N2 virus that has been known to circulate in swine for some time, and is said to be similar to an H1N1 virus (A/New Caledonia /20/99-like) that circulated as recently as 2007.


In neither case did these patients have recent known contact with swine, and so these reports imply that low level human-to-human transmission may have taken place.

 

First stop, a notice in today’s (otherwise quiet) FluView week 48 Report, followed by some choice excerpts from the latest Have You Heard? statement from the CDC.

 

http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/

Novel Influenza A Viruses:

Two human infections with novel influenza A viruses were detected in children from two states (Minnesota and West Virginia). One patient was infected with a novel influenza A (H1N2) virus and one patient was infected with a novel influenza A (H3N2) virus. Both patients have recovered from their illnesses. While both viruses are known to circulate in U.S. swine, there was no close contact with pigs reported preceding illness onset in either case. Both states have been investigating case contacts and sources of exposure, however, no additional confirmed cases have been detected at this time. Additional information on these cases can be found in the CDC Have You Heard posting.

 

CDC is required to report all cases of human infection with novel influenza viruses – including swine influenza viruses -- to the World Health Organization (WHO) as part of the International Health Regulations (IHR). Domestically, CDC reports these cases in this report and on its website. Early identification and investigation of human infections with novel influenza A viruses is critical to evaluate the extent of the outbreak and possible human-to-human transmission. Additional information on influenza in pigs and swine-origin influenza infection in humans can be found at http://www.cdc.gov/flu/swineflu/.

 

Below are some excerpts from today’s announcement (bolding & reparagraphing mine). Follow the link to read it in its entirety.

 

 

CDC confirms two human infections with novel influenza viruses

December 9, 2011 -- CDC has confirmed two cases of human infection with two different novel influenza A viruses in different states. Both patients have fully recovered. While the viruses infecting both patients have been found in U.S. swine and some of the prior human infections with these viruses have been associated with direct or close swine contact, there are no reports of direct or close contact with swine prior to illness onset in either of these cases. Laboratory testing at CDC has confirmed that both novel viruses are susceptible to the antiviral medications oseltamivir (Tamiflu®) and zanamivir (Relenza®).


<SNIP Narrative on 2 New Cases> 

 

Detection of Swine Influenza Infections in Humans


Human infections with novel influenza A viruses normally found in swine are rare events. Recently, however, the frequency of such detections has increased.

 

This could be occurring for a number of reasons, including one or more of the following factors:

 

First, laboratory methods for testing for these viruses in the United States were improved following the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. These improvements may be resulting in viruses being identified now that would have gone undetected previously.

 

Second, this could be due to increased surveillance in the United States for influenza at this time of year. CDC has requested that states analyze, and then send, their first influenza virus specimens of the season for seasonal influenza surveillance purposes. This practice, coupled with very low levels of seasonal flu activity at this time, could mean that sporadic novel influenza infections are more likely to be tested.

 

Third, it is possible that the increased frequency of detection of novel influenza viruses with swine origins identified by CDC represents a true increase in the number of such cases, possibly occurring from exposure to infected swine  or through subsequent, limited human-to-human transmission.

 

(Continue . . .)

 

 

While the CDC and public health officials are obviously taking these novel virus detections seriously, and are ramping up surveillance to track their spread, it is too soon to know whether any of these new flu strains will take hold in the human population.

 

As I wrote in Pseudo Pandemics And Viral Interlopers it is certainly possible for new strains of influenza to appear and circulate among humans, without sparking a pandemic.

 

Influenza is notoriously unpredictable.

 

For now, we are in a watchful waiting mode; looking for signs that one of these novel viruses is getting better adapted to human physiology.

 

In the meantime, maintaining good flu hygiene this winter (washing/sanitizing your hands, covering coughs & sneezes, staying home when sick), and getting your seasonal flu shot, remain the best strategies to avoid getting sick during this flu season.

»» Read More