# 5420
Although it’s been billed as a major step towards getting the nuclear crisis under control at the Fukushima nuclear facility, getting an external power line to the damaged reactors won’t necessarily solve all of the problems.
The hope is that with an external power source, the cooling pumps can be restarted, and the dangerously rising heat can be bled off from the reactors.
But that assumes that the pumps are undamaged from the initial quake, or from the hydrogen gas explosions that have occurred, or from the tons of sea water that emergency workers have been dousing the reactor buildings with for several days.
TEPCO has announced that the power lines are now connected, and that their plan is to “to supply Unit 2 [reactor No. 2] first, followed by Unit 1, Unit 3 and Unit 4 because Unit 2 is expected to be less damaged".
NHK World News provides a cautionary note, however, reporting that it may be `some time’ before engineers will be able to actually apply power to the pumps.
Outside power source won't be available soon
Friday, March 18, 2011 21:24 +0900 (JST)
The government says an outside power source is unlikely to be available at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant for some time, although electricity is urgently needed to cool the reactors.
The Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency said on Friday that the installation of power cables at the Number One and Number 2 reactors is expected to be completed on Saturday. The operation to add power cables at the Number 3 and Number 4 reactors is likely to end on Sunday.
The agency said, however, that it will take some time to confirm the safety of the damaged facilities.
How long `some time’ might be isn’t stated. Hours? Days?
That is something that very likely depends on just how badly damaged the cooling systems and their control systems are in these four reactors.
Related Post:
- WHO Report On Radiation Exposure From Fukushima Reactor Accident
- Fukushima Nuke Plant Remains In `Precarious State’
- Bulletin Of The Atomic Scientists: Fukushima Crisis in review
- A Different Kind Of Nuclear Fallout
- Cutting Through The Fukushima Fog
- IAEA Preliminary Assessment Of The Fukushima Disaster
- IAEA To Send Fact Finding Mission To Fukushima
- NSC: Fukushima Radiation Leak Underestimated
- Fukushima: A 10-Year Decommissioning Plan
- Fukushima: Brief Fire, 6.4 Aftershock & Severity Level To Be Raised
- Japan: IAEA Briefing April 8th
- NHK: Fukushima Leak `Appears To Be Lessening’
- Fukushima: A Drone’s Eye View
- Fukushima: Radiation Levels Soar At Reactor # 2 ?
- The IAEA Presentations Channel
- Fukushima: Voluntary Evacuation Urged in 20km - 30km Radius Zone
- Fukushima IAEA Updates: March 24th
- Fukushima: Monday Morning Roundup
- IAEA Update: The 6 Fukushima Reactors At A Glance
- Japan Cites `Some Progress’ In Nuke Crisis
- Japan: A Morning Roundup Of Nuke Reports
- OCHA Japan SITREP # 7
- High Radiation Readings 30 Km From Fukushima Facility
- Japan Raises Severity Of Fukushima Crisis
- Disaster’s Hidden Toll
- Estimating Fukushima’s Health Impact
- WHO Report On Radiation Exposure From Fukushima Reactor Accident
- Fukushima Nuke Plant Remains In `Precarious State’
- Bulletin Of The Atomic Scientists: Fukushima Crisis in review
- NHK News:`Widespread’ Strontium-90 Contamination In Fukushima
- Cutting Through The Fukushima Fog
- IAEA Preliminary Assessment Of The Fukushima Disaster
- IAEA To Send Fact Finding Mission To Fukushima
- NSC: Fukushima Radiation Leak Underestimated
- Fukushima: A 10-Year Decommissioning Plan
- IAEA Briefing On Fukushima Severity Level
- Fukushima: Brief Fire, 6.4 Aftershock & Severity Level To Be Raised
- IAEA Fukushima Briefing: April 10th
- Japan: IAEA Briefing April 8th
- NHK: Fukushima Leak `Appears To Be Lessening’
- Fukushima: A Drone’s Eye View
- CDC HAN Advisory: Fukushima Radiation Monitoring
- RadNet: The EPA’s Radiation Monitoring System
- Fukushima: Radiation Levels Soar At Reactor # 2 ?
- Nuke Agency: Reactor #3 Containment Function `Likely Damaged’
- Fukushima: Voluntary Evacuation Urged in 20km - 30km Radius Zone
- Fukushima IAEA Updates: March 24th
- WHO: FAQs On Japan’s Nuclear Concerns
- Fukushima: Monday Morning Roundup
- Disaster’s Hidden Toll
- Do1Thing: A 12 Step Preparedness Program
- Black Swan Events
- FEMA: Beware Of Post-Disaster Scam Artists
- NWS: Possible Coastal Storm Mid-Week
- Caveat Twitter
- Unreasonable Expectations
- A Worrisome Mid-Week Forecast
- NPM12: Because We Don’t Know What Tomorrow Will Bring
- Japan’s Earthquake: Learning from Megadisasters
- NPM12: Surviving Disaster – Texas Style
- East Coast Tsunami Threats
- A Disaster In Slow Motion
- NCDP’s Preparedness Wizard
- Building Disaster Resilient Cities
- A Prescription For Any Disaster
- Popocatepetl Webcam
- Fukushima Nuke Plant Remains In `Precarious State’
- UK: Civil Threat Risk Assessment
- Before You Decide To Head For The Hills . . .
- Bulletin Of The Atomic Scientists: Fukushima Crisis in review
- 2011: A Year Of Catastrophic Losses
- DFID: World Unprepared For Future Shocks
- TFAH: 2011 Ready or Not Report
- WHO e-Atlas Of Natural Disaster Risks To Europe
Widget by [ Iptek-4u ]