# 5417
NHK World News this morning is reporting that radiation readings some 30 kilometers northwest of the Fukushima nuclear facility over the past two days have been measured above 150 microsieverts per hour.
This is well outside of the Japanese evacuation zone (20 km) and on the outer cusp of the `stay indoors’ (20-30 km) zone.
First the NHK News article, then I’ll be back with more on relative radiation doses.
High radiation detected 30km from nuke plant
Friday, March 18, 2011 17:38 +0900 (JST)
Japan's science ministry says relatively high radiation levels have been detected on 2 consecutive days about 30 kilometers northwest of the quake-damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant.
The radiation measured 170 microsieverts per hour on Thursday and 150 microsieverts on Friday.
Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano says the government will take appropriate measures if this level of contamination continues in the area for a long period. But he says this would be unlikely.
Before anyone is tempted to head down to the bunker, it should be noted that people staying indoors in this region are likely experiencing a much lower exposure than these readings might suggest.
Theoretically, at 150 microsieverts an hour, over 24 hours a person would receive about 3.6 millisieverts of radiation – or about what much of the world’s population receives in background radiation every 1.5 to 2 years.
But to put that into perspective, an abdominal CT-Scan exposes you to roughly 8 millisieverts of radiation, or more than double that dose. And nuclear plant workers – under normal circumstances – are allowed up to 50 millisieverts of radiation exposure each year.
At about 100 millisieverts the risk of developing cancer sometime in the future due to radiation exposure begins to elevate very slightly.
According to the NIH full body exposure to 1000 millisieverts of ionizing radiation results in radiation sickness, while an exposure of 4,000 millisieverts is fatal in about 50% of cases (see Medline article Radiation sickness).
At 6,000 millisieverts (6 Sieverts), death is almost certain.
So, while well above normal, you’d have to be exposed to 3.6 millisieverts a day for nearly a month to reach the first tier of health concern; the 100 millisievert exposure range.
In other words, in the short term this level of exposure is unlikely to pose health risks to residents.
Over time, however, ongoing exposure to this level of radiation would be dangerous.
All of this assumes, of course, that the radiation readings we are getting from the stricken plant and monitoring stations nearby are both comprehensive and accurate.
Two assumptions that are difficult to make right now.
Related Post:
- Disaster’s Hidden Toll
- Estimating Fukushima’s Health Impact
- WHO Report On Radiation Exposure From Fukushima Reactor Accident
- Fukushima Nuke Plant Remains In `Precarious State’
- Bulletin Of The Atomic Scientists: Fukushima Crisis in review
- NHK News:`Widespread’ Strontium-90 Contamination In Fukushima
- Cutting Through The Fukushima Fog
- IAEA Preliminary Assessment Of The Fukushima Disaster
- IAEA To Send Fact Finding Mission To Fukushima
- NSC: Fukushima Radiation Leak Underestimated
- Fukushima: A 10-Year Decommissioning Plan
- IAEA Briefing On Fukushima Severity Level
- Fukushima: Brief Fire, 6.4 Aftershock & Severity Level To Be Raised
- IAEA Fukushima Briefing: April 10th
- Japan: IAEA Briefing April 8th
- NHK: Fukushima Leak `Appears To Be Lessening’
- Fukushima: A Drone’s Eye View
- CDC HAN Advisory: Fukushima Radiation Monitoring
- RadNet: The EPA’s Radiation Monitoring System
- Fukushima: Radiation Levels Soar At Reactor # 2 ?
- Nuke Agency: Reactor #3 Containment Function `Likely Damaged’
- Fukushima: Voluntary Evacuation Urged in 20km - 30km Radius Zone
- Fukushima IAEA Updates: March 24th
- WHO: FAQs On Japan’s Nuclear Concerns
- Fukushima: Monday Morning Roundup
- A Different Kind Of Nuclear Fallout
- IAEA Preliminary Assessment Of The Fukushima Disaster
- Fukushima: A 10-Year Decommissioning Plan
- IAEA Briefing On Fukushima Severity Level
- Fukushima: Brief Fire, 6.4 Aftershock & Severity Level To Be Raised
- The IAEA Presentations Channel
- Dueling Assessments: NRC Chairman On Nuclear Crisis
- WHO Report On Radiation Exposure From Fukushima Reactor Accident
- Fukushima Nuke Plant Remains In `Precarious State’
- Bulletin Of The Atomic Scientists: Fukushima Crisis in review
- A Different Kind Of Nuclear Fallout
- Cutting Through The Fukushima Fog
- IAEA Preliminary Assessment Of The Fukushima Disaster
- IAEA To Send Fact Finding Mission To Fukushima
- NSC: Fukushima Radiation Leak Underestimated
- Fukushima: A 10-Year Decommissioning Plan
- Fukushima: Brief Fire, 6.4 Aftershock & Severity Level To Be Raised
- Japan: IAEA Briefing April 8th
- NHK: Fukushima Leak `Appears To Be Lessening’
- Fukushima: A Drone’s Eye View
- Fukushima: Radiation Levels Soar At Reactor # 2 ?
- The IAEA Presentations Channel
- Fukushima: Voluntary Evacuation Urged in 20km - 30km Radius Zone
- Fukushima IAEA Updates: March 24th
- Fukushima: Monday Morning Roundup
- IAEA Update: The 6 Fukushima Reactors At A Glance
- Japan Cites `Some Progress’ In Nuke Crisis
- Japan: A Morning Roundup Of Nuke Reports
- Nuke: Power Line Connected, But May Not See Immediate Use
- OCHA Japan SITREP # 7
- Japan Raises Severity Of Fukushima Crisis
Widget by [ Iptek-4u ]