Showing posts with label disease spread. Show all posts
Showing posts with label disease spread. Show all posts

The 1919 Influenza Blues . . .

 

image

Arhoolie F-1018  Released in the 1960s Essie Jenkins et al.

 

 

# 6782

 

 

 

As it’s Friday, and some of my other interests run towards vintage audio recordings (and OTR: Old Time Radio), I was delighted to see a tweet by fellow blogger Jim Garrow ( @jgarrow & The Face of the Matter Blog) alerting his followers to a piece that appears today in Philly.com.

 

From 'TB Blues' to 'Bacteria': A musical medical history playlist

POSTED: Friday, December 14, 2012, 6:30 AM

 

You’ll find links to songs by a couple of early pioneers of American `Folk Music’ – Woody Guthrie and Jimmie Rogers – along with a  prohibition song by a lesser known, but still prolific in the 1920s & 30s, Asa Martin.

 

Essie Jenkins delivers the 1919 Influenza Blues. Regrettably, I’m unable to find much about her online.

 

Rounding out this old time playlist is a new entry, called Bacteria put together by Jonathan Coulton, cleverly using resampled audio from a KFC training video.

»» Read More

Disease Transmission At The Human-Animal Interface

image

28 page MMWR Recommendation & Report

 

# 6492

 

 

Recent headlines over the H3N2v flu virus that has jumped from pigs to a small number of humans across the Midwest have made a splash in the media, but the story is neither new, or particularly unusual.  

 

Humans in contact with animals, have always been at some risk of contracting zoonotic diseases. 

 

In a blog last year called The Third Epidemiological Transition, I described how – 100 centuries ago – mankind began to move towards a more agricultural society.  Well respected anthropologist and researcher George Armelagos of Emory University dubbed this the First Epidemiological transition.

 

We began to domesticate animals for food, using their waste as fertilizer, and created more food security than life as a nomadic hunter-gathering society could afford.

 

As we became tied to the land, families grew into villages, villages grew into towns, and towns grew into cities. But with these societal advances also came new diseases. 

 

Q Fever, Anthrax, measles and tuberculosis all gained access to human hosts from domesticated animals.  And with people clustered together in towns, and cities, these diseases were more easily spread among humans.

 

Influenza, while ubiquitous in humans today, is a disease native to waterfowl. It is unlikely that it spread very much among humans until we began to domesticate ducks and geese.

 

SARS, Ebola, bird flu, plague, Rabies, Lyme disease, West Nile, Nipah, HIV, Malaria . . . the list of diseases carried by other species - yet capable of infecting humans - is long and growing. 

 

Last June, in That Duck May Look Clean, But . . ., I wrote about a CDC investigation into an outbreak of Salmonella Montevideo involving 66 persons across 20 states linked to the handling of live poultry (baby chicks or ducklings or both) sold via mail-order hatcheries and  agricultural feed stores.

 

Similar warnings have gone out in the past regarding Human Salmonella Infections Linked to Small Turtles.  Like poultry, reptiles and amphibians can sometimes carry and spread the salmonella bacteria, which makes good hand hygiene particularly important after handling them.

 

image

There was an outbreak of Monkeypox – a cousin to the now eradicated small pox virus - in the United States back in 2003, after dozens of people were exposed to infected prairie dogs at a pet shop in Illinois.

 

Last March, in How Parrot Fever Changed Public Health In America, I wrote about how Chlamydophila psittaci, or `Parrot Fever’, spread across the country in 1929, sparking fears of a new pandemic.

 

And just this week (see Typhus alert issued for city of Long Beach) a California city has warned its residents about cases of flea-borne typhus, which may be carried by rodents, possums, raccoons  and cats.

 


With the recent spate of swine flu infections connected with county fairs in the Midwest, the message is going out from local health departments, and the CDC, on the importance of protecting yourself against animal borne diseases.

 

image

 

With the fall school session about to begin, the CDC has published advice on the safe viewing of, and contact with, animals in schools and day care centers. 


A few excerpts follow, but click the link to read the CDC’s advice in its entirety.

 

 

Animals in Schools and Daycare Settings

Photo: Girl looking in jar

Animals can provide important opportunities for entertainment and learning. However, there is also a risk for getting sick or hurt from contact with animals, including those in school and daycare classrooms.

<SNIP>

What types of diseases can animals spread? Can they cause injuries?

In the United States, the biggest risk of human illnesses from animals, especially to young children, is getting infected with germs like Salmonella, E. coli O157:H7 and others that cause vomiting, diarrhea, fever, and abdominal cramping. Animals can also carry germs that cause other kinds of diseases, such as rabies. Animals may have germs on their bodies and in their droppings, even when they appear clean and healthy. The germs can also get on cages, bedding, and wherever animals roam or walk around, and can contaminate these areas.

 

Injuries caused by animals in public settings include bites, kicks, scratches, and others. Most injuries from animals can be prevented if schools and daycare classrooms follow proper safety precautions.

 

How can I reduce the risk of illness from touching or being around animals?

After you touch an animal, or anything in the areas where they live and roam, wash your hands right away to help prevent illness. Read the following tips to learn more about hand washing:

  • Always wash hands right after handling animals, their food, and/or their habitats (for example, cages, water bowls, toys). Also, everyone should wash their hands after going to the toilet, before eating and drinking, before preparing food or drinks, and after removing soiled clothes or shoes.
  • Adults should always supervise hand washing for young children.
  • Running water and soap are best. Use hand sanitizers if running water and soap are not available. Be sure to wash your hands with soap and water as soon as a sink is available.
  • Directions for washing hands can be found here.

<SNIP>

Other Animals Not Recommended in School or Child-Care Settings include:

  • Inherently dangerous animals (e.g., lions, tigers, cougars, and bears).
  • Nonhuman primates (e.g., monkeys and apes).
  • Mammals at high risk for transmitting rabies (e.g., bats, raccoons, skunks, foxes, and coyotes).
  • Aggressive or unpredictable wild or domestic animals.
  • Stray animals with unknown health and vaccination history.
  • Venomous or toxin-producing spiders, insects, reptiles, and amphibians.

(Continue . . . )

Read the Compendium of Measures to Prevent Disease Associated with Animals in Public Settings, 2011  [PDF - 1.33MB]

 

 

Whether is it raising livestock, encountering animals in the wild, or providing a good home to a beloved pet – our interactions with other species enrich our lives. 

 

But as with everything else in the world, there are some risks involved.

 

Knowing the dangers, and taking sensible steps to protect yourself from disease or injury, can help make sure these encounters remain positive ones.

»» Read More

PNAS: Human Networking & Infectious Disease Spread

 


# 5140

Note: Fixed broken link.

 

 

A truly ingenious piece of research, published yesterday in PNAS, that uses wireless technologies to chart the opportunities an airborne virus has to spread in a closed, heavily populated environment, like a high school.

 

The authors wired 655 students, 73 teachers, 55 staff, and 5 others with tiny remote sensors (called motes) that detected each time any of them came within 3 meters of another individual.

 

The movements, contacts (including duration), and clustering of individuals were recorded every 20 seconds over the period of a single school day in January, and during that time they collected 762,868 CPIs (Close Proximity Interactions).

 

They then ran a series of computer simulations, assigning each student (1 student at a time) as an index case with an infectious respiratory virus, and using thousands of computer runs, determined whether or not secondary transmission would occur.

 

Although no secondary transmission occurs in 2/3rds of the simulation runs - were a virus circulating in the community - multiple introductions would be expected, raising the odds of ongoing transmission.

 

The researchers also looked at the effects on transmission due to different vaccination strategies (random, students, teachers).

 

There’s a lot in this open access paper, which is admittedly heavy on math and statistics. Luckily we’ve a press release, a short audio podcast, and the abstract to give us the highlights.

 

First, the study and abstract (slightly reparagraphed for readability).

 

A high-resolution human contact network for infectious disease transmission

10.1073/pnas.1009094108

 

Marcel Salathé, Maria Kazandjieva, Jung Woo Lee, Philip Levis, Marcus W. Feldman, and James H. Jones

Abstract

The most frequent infectious diseases in humans—and those with the highest potential for rapid pandemic spread—are usually transmitted via droplets during close proximity interactions (CPIs). Despite the importance of this transmission route, very little is known about the dynamic patterns of CPIs.

 

Using wireless sensor network technology, we obtained high-resolution data of CPIs during a typical day at an American high school, permitting the reconstruction of the social network relevant for infectious disease transmission.

 

At 94% coverage, we collected 762,868 CPIs at a maximal distance of 3 m among 788 individuals. The data revealed a high-density network with typical small-world properties and a relatively homogeneous distribution of both interaction time and interaction partners among subjects.

 

Computer simulations of the spread of an influenza-like disease on the weighted contact graph are in good agreement with absentee data during the most recent influenza season. Analysis of targeted immunization strategies suggested that contact network data are required to design strategies that are significantly more effective than random immunization. Immunization strategies based on contact network data were most effective at high vaccination coverage.

 

You can listen to a brief interview with one of the authors (Marcel Salathé) HERE.

 

And a press release, from the National Science Foundation, provides the basics.

 

Human networking theory gives picture of infectious disease spread

High school students' interactions provide new look at disease transmission

It's colds and flu season, and as any parent knows, colds and flu spread like wildfire, especially through schools.

 

New research using human-networking theory may give a clearer picture of just how, exactly, infectious diseases such as the common cold, influenza, whooping cough and SARS can spread through a closed group of people, and even through populations at large.

 

With the help of 788 volunteers at a high school, Marcel Salathé, a biologist at Penn State University, developed a new technique to count the number of possible disease-spreading events that occur in a typical day.

 

This results are published in this week's issue of the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

 

The research was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

(Continue . . . )

 

 

My thanks to Carol@SC and Jane on the Flu Wiki  for the head’s up on these links.

»» Read More